Power of Siberia 2: Russia-China Gas Pipeline’s Strategic Stakes and Market Implications
During the Russia‑China summit on 20 May 2026, Presidents Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping announced a shared understanding on the main parameters of the Power of Siberia 2 (POS‑2) pipeline – its route through western Siberia, Mongolia and into China, and the construction approach. Detailed commercial terms remain unresolved.
Summit Consensus on Route and Construction of POS‑2
The leaders confirmed agreement on the pipeline’s alignment and the technical framework, but emphasized that pricing, financing and a detailed timetable still need to be finalised.
Pipeline Capacity and Economic Scale Compared to Global Benchmarks
The proposed line will span roughly 2,600 km (1,616 mi) and transport up to 50 billion cubic metres (1.77 trillion cubic feet) of natural gas per year, equivalent to about 525 TWh – almost twice the United Kingdom’s annual electricity consumption. For perspective:
- Nord Stream 1 capacity: 55 bcm/yr
- POS‑1 reached full capacity in 2024 after construction began in 2014
- Estimated project horizon: up to 10 years from construction start to full output
Geopolitical and Market Ramifications for Russia and China
For Russia, POS‑2 offers a new outlet for gas previously destined for Europe, helping Gazprom recoup revenue lost after the 2022 sanctions. The pipeline also promises multiplier effects for Russian steel and construction firms.
For China, the line reduces dependence on seaborne LNG that must navigate chokepoints such as the Strait of Hormuz and the Strait of Malacca, providing a more secure, lower‑cost supply and shielding the market from geopolitical volatility.
Outlook: Timeline, Pricing Negotiations and Energy Market Shifts
Negotiations are stalled primarily over price – China seeks rates linked to its heavily subsidised domestic gas, while Russia aims for terms closer to those of POS‑1. No definitive timetable has been set. Analysts project that, if an agreement is reached, the pipeline could begin deliveries in the early 2030s, reshaping global gas flows by:
- Cutting China’s future LNG import demand
- Softening Atlantic‑based LNG price pressures
- Accelerating a regionalised gas market centred on long‑term bilateral contracts
Nevertheless, both sides face risks: Russia may become a price‑taker to a single customer, and China could over‑concentrate supply from a politically volatile partner.