Back to Headlines
Tech
Apr 30, 2026
Analyzed by GPT OSS 120B

Musk Calls Himself a ‘Fool’ for Funding OpenAI as Trial Enters Day Two

AI Summary
Elon Musk returned to the Oakland courtroom on day two of his lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI, again branding the venture a stolen charity. The case, which pits two of Silicon Valley’s most powerful figures against each other, carries a $134 bn damages claim and could reshape OpenAI’s pending IPO.

Lead: Musk’s Self‑Critique Sets the Tone for a High‑Stakes Trial

Elon Musk opened the second day of his lawsuit against Sam Altman and OpenAI by calling himself a “fool” for funding the company, reiterating that the nonprofit was “stolen” and now threatens humanity. The courtroom drama in Oakland, California has drawn intense media attention and could determine the future structure of one of the world’s most valuable AI firms.

Musk’s Day‑Two Testimony Reiterates ‘Stole a Charity’ Claim

Musk repeated his accusation that Altman “stole a charity,” arguing that OpenAI’s shift from a nonprofit to a for‑profit entity breached the original founding agreement. He described a 2015 conversation with Google co‑founder Larry Page that spurred his initial investment, and he highlighted email exchanges from 2017 that, in his view, showed Altman reneging on promises.

  • Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers warned spectators against photography, threatening to close an overflow room.
  • Musk’s lawyers presented emails praising his technical expertise and a document where Musk called OpenAI’s safety team “jackasses,” which he later framed as a joke.

Financial Stakes: $134 bn Claim and Musk’s $38 m Investment

The lawsuit seeks the removal of Altman and co‑founder Greg Brockman, the reversal of OpenAI’s for‑profit structure, and $134 bn in damages to be redirected to the nonprofit arm. Musk’s own financial involvement includes:

  • A reported $38 m contribution that OpenAI describes as a tax‑deductible donation.
  • Quarterly payments of $5 m that continued after the initial funding.
  • Claims that he funded OpenAI’s rent and operations while believing the entity would stay nonprofit.

Implications for OpenAI’s IPO and AI Governance

OpenAI is planning a public listing later this year with a target valuation near $1 tn. A court‑ordered restructuring or leadership change could derail that IPO, affecting investors and the broader AI market. The case also raises questions about:

  • Governance mechanisms for hybrid nonprofit‑for‑profit AI entities.
  • Potential precedent for future disputes over AI safety commitments.
  • Investor confidence in companies that blend charitable missions with commercial ambitions.

What the Next Weeks Could Mean for Silicon Valley’s Power Balance

With a nine‑person jury expected to deliberate over roughly three weeks, the outcome may reshape the power dynamics between visionary founders and corporate governance structures. If the court sides with Musk, we could see:

  • Reinstatement of a stricter nonprofit oversight model for OpenAI.
  • Increased scrutiny of founder‑led AI projects and their funding sources.
  • Potential ripple effects on other AI startups facing similar governance debates.

Conversely, a ruling in favor of Altman would reinforce the current for‑profit trajectory, likely accelerating OpenAI’s market debut and solidifying its position as a dominant AI platform.