Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

The Struggle to Insure Chinese EVs UK insurers are more hesitant to cover some hybrid and electric vehicles (EVs) from China than cars from other countries, research suggests. While some drivers can save money by buying cars made in China, they may have more limited options to get insurance than those buying electric, hybrid and petrol cars from Europe, the US and South Korea. Insurance Availability and Cost Chinese brands such as BYD, XPeng and Jaecoo have become increasingly common on UK roads. However, figures from sales site Carwow show that sourcing insurance may take some of the sheen off buying a Chinese car. In its survey, half of the requests for quotes were declined. Axa declined to give quotes on any of the vehicles. Hastings Direct only offered coverage on the BYD. Direct Line declined two vehicles and Admiral one. Only Aviva offered cover for all. The Data Analysis The average cost of covering the Jaecoo 7 was £1,103 a year – almost twice what it would cost to cover a Skoda Karoq (£577), an SUV picked by Carwow as a petrol equivalent. Only Admiral and Aviva would cover the XPeng, at an average cost of £936 a year – well above the figure for the petrol equivalent Hyundai Kona (£639). The Impact Analysis Insurers are still building up repair data, parts supply chains and long-term claims histories for many newer models, which is making some providers cautious. Iain Reid of Carwow says that more limited options for cover mean that drivers of Chinese cars have less ability to shop around and get more competitive quotes. The Prediction As Chinese manufacturers become more established on British roads, insurance availability and pricing should improve. Oliver Lowe, the head of product at Omoda and Jaecoo UK, says the company is working closely with insurers to reduce those insurance costs.

Lead: Alarming Frequency of Lithium‑Ion Fires Across the UK Fire brigades in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland are now responding to a lithium‑ion battery fire about every five hours, according to data compiled by insurer QBE. The trend highlights a growing safety gap as rechargeable devices become ever more ubiquitous. Rising Callouts Reveal a Surge in Battery‑Related Blazes Freedom‑of‑information requests show that fire services logged 1,760 fires linked to lithium‑ion batteries in 2025 – roughly 4.8 fires a day. This marks a 147% increase over the previous three years. Electric‑vehicle fires alone rose 133% while the number of EVs on UK roads tripled in the same period. 520 callouts involved e‑bikes in 2025, up from 149 in 2022. London Fire Brigade handled 44% of those e‑bike incidents, with 230 fires in the capital and five fatalities over three years. Nearly half (46%) of all lithium‑ion fires occurred in private homes. Numbers Paint a Stark Picture of Growth and Cost The financial toll of improper disposal is now estimated at over £1bn annually, driven by fires in bin lorries and recycling facilities. Responding to these incidents can require up to 10 times more water than a conventional fire, due to the intense heat of thermal runaway. Safety Gaps and Regulatory Lag Amplify Public Risk Spencer Sutcliff, deputy commissioner for prevention at the London Fire Brigade, warned that “public awareness is vital” and that regulation has not kept pace with the market. The National Fire Chiefs Council echoed concerns, especially around poorly manufactured or converted e‑bikes, which are disproportionately represented in fire statistics. The Fire Brigades Union stressed the need for investment in training and equipment to protect firefighters from toxic gases released during lithium‑ion fires. What Comes Next: Calls for Regulation, Training, and Public Awareness Stakeholders are urging a multi‑pronged response: Introduce stricter product safety standards for batteries, chargers, and conversion kits. Mandate clear, consistent guidance on safe charging, storage, and disposal – e.g., using certified e‑bike batteries and avoiding overnight charging. Boost funding for fire services to acquire specialised equipment for toxic‑gas mitigation. Launch nationwide awareness campaigns targeting consumers and online marketplaces. Without these measures, the frequency of lithium‑ion fires is likely to keep climbing as the market for rechargeable devices expands.

The UK tax authorities have officially confirmed they will appeal a landmark ruling that would have slashed VAT on public electric vehicle (EV) chargers from 20% to 5%. The decision comes after a London tax tribunal found that the government had been overcharging drivers for years due to a technical loophole in the VAT Act.Key DevelopmentsHMRC Appeal: The tax authority stated it is appealing the decision to maintain that standard rate VAT applies to electricity supplied through public EV charging infrastructure.Tribunal Ruling: Judge Harriet Morgan ruled that the 5% rate should have applied to Charge My Street, a not-for-profit operator, based on the interpretation that electricity counts as "always for domestic use" if consumption is under 1,000 kWh per month.Industry Response: Charge point operators like char.gy have criticized the move, calling it a "deeply disappointing decision" that sends the wrong signal to the millions of drivers relying on public networks.Legal Loophole: Accountancy firm Deloitte identified the discrepancy, arguing that the current 20% rate is a "strained construction" of the law.Data & Market ImpactThe financial implications of this tax disparity are significant. Currently, the higher VAT rate generates an extra £85m a year for the Treasury. However, projections indicate this figure could soar to £315m by 2030 as the number of electric cars on UK roads increases. This revenue is currently replacing the £24.5bn in annual fuel duties from petrol and diesel, a gap the government is eager to maintain.Why This MattersThis appeal represents a direct conflict between fiscal policy and environmental goals. The ruling threatens to create a 15% cost disparity between home and public charging, disproportionately affecting the 40% of the UK population who do not have driveways or off-street parking. By maintaining the higher tax rate, the government risks disincentivizing the adoption of EVs among renters and city dwellers, slowing the transition away from polluting petrol and diesel vehicles.Expert InsightThe government's decision to appeal reveals a strategic prioritization of short-term fiscal stability over long-term behavioral change. While the UK aims to accelerate EV adoption, the Treasury is facing immense pressure to replace lost fuel duty revenue. The introduction of pay-per-mile road taxes for electric vehicles suggests the government is preparing to tax EVs regardless of how they are charged. By appealing this ruling, HMRC is attempting to lock in a revenue stream that will only grow as the EV market expands, ensuring that the green transition does not come at the cost of the public purse.What Happens NextThe case will move to the Upper Tax Tribunal, where the government will argue for the standard 20% rate. If the appeal fails, it is expected that other charge point operators will immediately lodge claims for overpaid VAT dating back years. Furthermore, the government’s commitment to introducing pay-per-mile road taxes for all electric vehicles indicates that the era of fuel duty is ending, and a new era of road taxation is beginning, regardless of how the VAT ruling resolves.

The ongoing Iran war has led to a surge in petrol and diesel prices, sparking concerns about fuel rationing across Europe and calls for Britain to increase North Sea oil and gas production. However, experts suggest that a more effective solution lies in promoting electric vehicles (EVs). According to analysis by Mandala Partners, if the UK had the same proportion of electric cars as Norway, its fuel reserve could increase by seven days. Currently, the UK has about three weeks' worth of car fuel in reserve. Norway leads the world with nearly 32% of its cars being fully electric, compared to 5.4% in the UK. Even with the existing number of electric and hybrid cars on British roads, they are already saving about two days' worth of fuel. This is particularly significant given that Shell's chief executive, Wael Sawan, has warned that Europe could face fuel shortages as early as April if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed. The potential impact of EVs goes beyond just reducing petrol and diesel consumption. Every electric car charged from the grid rather than the pump extends the country's fuel reserves. Moreover, with the right technology, EVs could become an active buffer against future energy shocks by storing and resharing energy. Vehicle-to-grid technology, which allows EVs to send energy back into the power grid, could make a significant difference in an energy supply crisis. An electric car usually holds about 40 kilowatt-hours of power, enough for an average UK home for several days. This technology could enable millions of car batteries to supply power to the grid when demand spikes. Despite these benefits, the adoption of EVs and vehicle-to-grid technology faces challenges. Tax policy is a significant barrier, as EV owners pay tax on electricity when filling their car battery and again when selling it back to the grid. Additionally, the hardware for two-way charging is not yet widely available, although many electric cars are already capable of it. The energy regulator Ofgem has suggested that if half of the expected 11m EVs on UK roads by 2030 were capable of two-way charging, they could send 16 gigawatts of power back to the grid each day, almost half the output of Britain's gas-power station fleet.