Economy
Jun 25, 2026
Andy Haldane Proposes Home‑Bias for £50bn UK Pension Tax Relief
At the BCC conference, Andy Haldane argued that the £50bn of pension tax relief should be tied to i…
Andy Haldane, president of the British Chambers of Commerce, urged that pension tax relief exceeding £50bn be reserved for savers willing to invest in UK companies, positioning the proposal as a cornerstone of a new economic plan.Haldane Calls for a Home‑Bias in Pension Tax ReliefSpeaking at the annual BCC conference in London, the former Bank of England chief economist said the current system lacks any requirement for pension funds to support domestic businesses. He framed a "home bias" as a solution to the chronic funding shortfall faced by small‑ and medium‑sized enterprises (SMEs).Current pension tax relief tops up savings at the marginal tax rate for higher‑rate taxpayers.More than 70% of households, according to surveys, would prefer their savings to be invested in UK firms.The government already provides over £10bn in ISA tax relief without any domestic‑investment condition.£50bn Tax Relief at Stake and Potential Investment ShiftThe relief scheme is estimated to cost the Treasury over £50bn annually. Haldane argues that attaching a "home‑bias" condition could redirect a substantial portion of this amount into UK‑based companies, without requiring direct taxpayer spending.Higher‑rate (40%) and additional‑rate (45%) taxpayers are the primary beneficiaries of the current relief.Low‑income earners are largely excluded from pension tax benefits.Haldane estimates "trillions of pounds" are idle in global markets seeking productive deployment.Implications for UK SMEs and the City’s Funding LandscapeIf implemented, the proposal would reshape the relationship between British capital owners and domestic businesses. City firms have historically lobbied against mandatory investment clauses, fearing reduced portfolio flexibility. However, a mandated home bias could:Provide a steady source of equity for growth‑stage startups.Reduce reliance on the National Wealth Fund as the sole government‑driven catalyst.Potentially improve the UK’s balance of payments by retaining capital that would otherwise flow abroad.What the Next Legislative Push Could Mean for Pensions and Capital MarketsChancellor Rachel Reeves has floated the idea of obliging pension schemes to allocate a proportion of assets to UK investments, but the mandatory clause was omitted from the Pension Schemes Act 2026 after intense lobbying. Haldane’s remarks suggest a renewed push for legislative change, likely involving:Extended consultation with the pensions industry to design a workable “home‑bias” rule.Potential amendment to the tax code to tie relief eligibility to domestic investment thresholds.Long‑term timeline: several years before any new rule could be codified and operational.Should the government adopt Haldane’s recommendation, the UK could see a marked increase in private‑sector funding for SMEs, a tighter alignment of pension savings with national economic goals, and a new precedent for using tax policy to steer capital flows.
#Andy Haldane
#Rachel Reeves
#British Chambers of Commerce
Read More