Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

The LeadThe co-owner of GB News, a British TV channel accused of broadcasting climate change denial, has donated £28m to influential Church of England institutions that support climate action. This raises serious questions among Christian leaders about the alignment between Sir Paul Marshall's views and the institutions he's funding.The Financial ContradictionMarshall, a hedge fund manager and Christian, gave at least £13m to Holy Trinity Brompton (HTB) church and the Church Revitalisation Trust (CRT) via his Sequoia Trust between 2018 and 2025. HTB is the largest church in the Church of England, with a congregation of about 4,000, and is home to the evangelical Alpha Course, which has reached 37 million people in more than 175 countries. The CRT, run from HTB, has established more than 100 evangelical churches around the UK.Unlike in previous years, the Sequoia Trust accounts for 2024-25 do not name the recipients of donations, but record £10.2m given to faith-based institutions. The trust had a market value of £477m on 30 June 2025, the most recent figure available.The Climate DivideThis financial support creates a significant contradiction, as Marshall's views on the climate crisis and those frequently broadcast on GB News are "in direct opposition" to the Church of England's position. The Church believes that "responding to the climate crisis is an essential part of our responsibility to safeguard God's creation and achieve a just world" and has a routemap for all parts of the church to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2030.Marshall has described efforts to cut planet-heating emissions as "impoverishing people" and recently said the UK had been infected by "climate derangement syndrome." He also claimed that the extent to which global heating is being caused by human actions is "still subject to debate"—a position directly contradicted by climate science, which has established that about 100% of global heating since 1950 was caused by human emissions and activities.The Media InfluenceGB News has been accused of broadcasting climate change denial, including descriptions of global heating as "the climate scam" and suggestions the government was going to introduce "enforced veganism." The channel broadcast 953 attacks on climate science and climate action around the 2024 general election, according to a report.In March, Marshall was criticised by a group of more than 120 church leaders, including the former archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams and two current bishops, over his climate views and GB News's attacks on climate science and action. The group also raised the £1.8bn of fossil fuel investments reportedly held in 2023 by the hedge fund Marshall manages and asked him to be transparent about any personal conflicts of interest.The Future ImplicationsRev Dr Darrell Hannah, the chair of Operation Noah, a leading UK Christian climate charity, said: "As the climate crisis intensifies, we're increasingly concerned that a fellow Christian – one with more money and power than virtually any other Christian in the UK – continues to share problematic and highly influential views on the most important issue of our time. This cannot go unchallenged."The broadcasting regulator Ofcom decided in May to investigate whether GB News had breached rules on "due impartiality and material misleadingness" in relation to a repeat showing of an interview with Donald Trump in November, during which the US president claimed climate change was "a hoax" without being challenged.Marshall defended his position, stating: "Sir Paul generally agrees with Christian and Anglican teaching on the environment and climate change. Like many people, including many Christians, he just doesn't subscribe to net zero by 2050 due to the serious negative impact on poor people, their communities and the economy."

Protesters Interrupt NatWest AGM with Climate SongThe chair of NatWest was forced to defend the bank against accusations of “climate backtracking” when activists from the XR Money Rebellion sang a rendition of Frère Jacques—"No more bombs, no more oil"—during the opening speech of the annual general meeting in Edinburgh. The protest halted the proceedings for roughly thirty minutes before the meeting resumed.Protesters wore black T‑shirts reading “No more big oil” and “No bombs”.Representative Mara Lilley of the Church of England pension board announced a vote against chair Rick Haythornthwaite’s re‑election over climate concerns.The disruption coincided with heightened shareholder questioning of climate policy and staff remuneration.Financial Stakes: £19bn Transition Finance and £200bn Sustainable Lending GoalNatWest disclosed that it provided £19 bn of energy‑transition finance in the second half of 2025 and set an ambitious target of £200 bn in sustainable lending by 2030. The bank also reported that oil and gas financing now represents only 0.6% of total lending.Goal: halve climate impact versus 2019 levels (currently at 39%).Net‑zero financing target: 2050.Executive pay: CEO Paul Thwaite to receive £6.6 m in 2025‑26.Boardroom Tension: Shareholder Dissent and Policy Shift ImplicationsDespite a 92% approval for Haythornthwaite’s re‑election—the lowest among 25 resolutions—significant dissent emerged. Jeanne Martin of Share Action, representing investors with $1.4 tn assets, warned that the softened fossil‑fuel policy could amplify physical risks such as flooding and heatwaves, threatening long‑term financial stability.Share Action called the policy change a “slight shift” that risks “accelerating exposure to physical risks”.Unite union representatives highlighted rising dividends and executive pay versus staff hardship.Future Outlook: Pressure on NatWest’s Climate Commitments and Stakeholder RelationsHaythornthwaite agreed to meet with concerned investors within three months, signalling a potential recalibration of the bank’s climate roadmap. Continued activist pressure and shareholder activism suggest NatWest will need to balance its pragmatic middle‑road approach with demonstrable progress on sustainable financing to restore confidence.Potential outcomes: tighter fossil‑fuel financing restrictions, enhanced reporting on transition plans, or renewed stakeholder dialogue.Long‑term risk: erosion of investor trust could affect capital costs and market reputation.

NatWest’s upcoming AGM in Edinburgh is set to become a flashpoint as investors and climate scientists demand a reversal of recent policy roll‑backs that they label “climate backtracking”.ShareAction Mobilises Investors Ahead of NatWest AGMShareAction is leading a coordinated campaign to present protest votes against Rick Haythornthwaite, the bank’s chair. The group will deliver letters signed by major institutional investors and a separate statement signed by 70 climate scientists, urging NatWest to restore its former fossil‑fuel restrictions.Letters will be presented at the AGM on Tuesday in Edinburgh.Investors such as the Church of England Pensions Board, Rathbones, EdenTree, Nest and the Greater Manchester Pension Fund are backing the protest.The scientists’ letter calls for an immediate halt to the “backtracking on climate commitments”.Scale of Investor Opposition: $1.4 tn in Assets and Institutional BackingThe campaign cites signatories who collectively manage $1.4 tn in assets, underscoring the financial weight behind the climate push.70 climate experts have signed the scientific appeal.Key policy roll‑backs include dropping a ban on lending to oil‑and‑gas firms without credible transition plans and abandoning sector‑specific targets for aluminium, cement, iron and steel.Potential Repercussions for NatWest’s Climate Credibility and Shareholder TrustIf the protest votes succeed, NatWest could face a credibility gap that jeopardises its positioning as a climate‑conscious lender. The backlash may also trigger:Increased scrutiny from UK regulators on green‑finance disclosures.Pressure from other ESG‑focused investors to reinstate stricter lending criteria.Reputational damage that could affect retail banking relationships.What the Outcome Could Signal for UK Banking Climate GovernanceThe AGM will serve as a bellwether for how UK banks balance shareholder returns with climate commitments. A decisive vote against the chair could compel NatWest to:Re‑commit to net‑zero financing by 2050 with clearer interim targets.Re‑introduce bans on financing high‑emission sectors lacking transition plans.Engage more transparently with activist investors on climate strategy.Conversely, if the board retains its current course, activist groups may intensify campaigns, potentially influencing future policy reforms across the sector.