Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

Ian Cheshire steps into the helm of Ofcom with a comprehensive 2026‑27 plan that spans telecoms, broadband, postal services, broadcast media and the digital sphere. While the breadth of responsibilities is vast, the regulator’s work on the Online Safety Act (OSA) is set to dominate his tenure.The OSA, the UK’s flagship legislation governing social‑media, search and video platforms, has become a flashpoint between internet‑safety advocates and free‑speech proponents. Campaigners such as Ian Russell – father of Molly Russell, whose tragic suicide highlighted online harms – and filmmaker Beeban Kidron are urging a tougher regulatory stance.Last year, Russell publicly called for a change in Ofcom’s leadership, citing the watchdog’s failure to block an online suicide forum accessible to UK users. At the same time, Technology Secretary Liz Kendall wrote to Ofcom expressing “deep concern” over delays in rolling out key OSA provisions.Although updating the act is a parliamentary responsibility, Cheshire’s close ties to government could accelerate ministerial action. The OSA, passed in 2023, only began substantive implementation under chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes, with the introduction of rigorous age‑gating measures last year marking the first tangible impact on users.Beyond online safety, Ofcom must continue its core duties established in 2003: supervising public‑service broadcasting, ensuring impartial news, maintaining universal postal delivery six days a week, and monitoring broadband and mobile‑phone coverage across the UK. The government’s expectation is clear – the regulator must move faster on digital safety without neglecting these legacy functions.A looming test of the OSA’s strength is the investigation into the partial nudification of women and girls by Elon Musk’s AI tool Grok. The outcome will signal how effectively Ofcom can enforce the act against emerging AI‑driven harms.The 2026‑27 plan lists projects such as preventing illegal content from going viral, measuring harmful material encountered by children, and assessing the effectiveness of age‑gating. Additional measures targeting major platforms like Google and Instagram remain stalled due to ongoing court proceedings.Recent incidents – from misinformation spikes following the Southport killings to AI‑generated misogyny on X – underscore the urgency. While the legislation provides Cheshire with a framework, the patience of campaigners and policymakers is wearing thin.

Last week, a coalition of more than 120 Christian leaders sent an open letter—published by The Guardian—to Sir Paul Marshall, the hedge‑fund manager who partly owns GB News. The letter accused the channel of spreading climate misinformation and called for full disclosure of any personal investments in fossil fuels, as well as transparency from GB News presenters and guests. Instead of addressing those transparency demands, Sir Paul replied in a Guardian letter, asserting that the “net‑zero consensus is crumbling.” This claim runs counter to multiple public‑opinion surveys that show a robust majority of Britons still favour decarbonisation efforts. What has shifted, analysts note, is that two of the United Kingdom’s major political parties now oppose a legally binding net‑zero target. Their stance does not appear to reflect public sentiment, prompting observers to question the motives behind the growing anti‑net‑zero rhetoric. Critics warn that as the nation’s reliance on expensive and volatile fossil fuels persists, the country edges closer to dangerous climate tipping points while households grapple with soaring energy costs. Rev Dr Darrell Hannah, chair of Operation Noah, described the situation as “curious and disheartening,” suggesting that GB News is intent on preserving an unsustainable status quo. London‑based commentator Judith Russenberger added that Sir Paul and his outlet ignore a wealth of scientific and economic evidence. She emphasized that the planet is heating faster than ever, not merely undergoing a “gradual warming phase,” and that the UK’s high electricity prices stem from a pricing system that ties power costs to the price of gas, rather than the cost of wind or solar generation. These challenges highlight a broader clash between media narratives, political positioning, and the public’s clear appetite for decisive climate action.

Jonathan, the world's oldest living land animal, a 194-year-old giant tortoise, was recently caught in a viral crypto death scam. A fake social media post claiming his death was shared on X, garnering 2 million views and reported as fact by several news outlets, including the BBC. The post, attributed to an impersonator of Jonathan's vet, Joe Hollins, announced the tortoise's 'passing' and requested crypto donations. However, Hollins confirmed that Jonathan is very much alive and that the impersonator was based in Brazil. Jonathan, a Seychelles giant tortoise, has lived on Saint Helena since 1882. He resides on the grounds of the governor's mansion and has become a local celebrity, even appearing on the reverse of St Helena's 5p coin. Despite being blind from cataracts and having lost his sense of smell, Jonathan remains in good health with a strong appetite for bananas. The governor of Saint Helena, Nigel Phillips, shared a photo of Jonathan with an iPad displaying the BBC homepage as proof of life. The scam has caused concern in the small island community of approximately 4,440 people, highlighting the vulnerability of public figures, even those as long-lived as Jonathan, to crypto scams and misinformation.

Recent headlines suggesting a Christian revival in Britain, based on a YouGov survey claiming increasing church attendance, have been dramatically undermined by the revelation that the data was fraudulent and subsequently withdrawn. This incident has sparked serious concerns about the integrity of polling data in an era of advancing artificial intelligence.The Bible Society's 2024 report, which claimed church attendance was rising particularly among young people, has become a case study in how AI-generated bogus responses are infesting online surveys. Researchers warn that this vulnerability extends beyond religious statistics to potentially distort our understanding of broader social trends.David Voas, a quantitative social scientist at University College London, emphasized the difficulty of correcting such misinformation once it spreads. "The amount of effort required to correct it is an order of magnitude higher than the effort needed to disseminate it in the first place," he stated, noting that this problem affects polling companies beyond just YouGov.The growth of AI has exacerbated this issue, according to Sean Westwood, an associate professor at Dartmouth College. "The assumption with survey research – that someone gives coherent, logical answers, they're a real person – that assumption is now broken," he explained. Westwood warned that AI models pose an existential threat to our understanding of society.Westwood detailed how AI can be weaponized: "A single sentence of instruction is enough to systematically bias its answers on political polls or geopolitical questions, while keeping its demographic profile intact so the manipulation is invisible to standard screening." Even without explicit instructions to cheat, AI can identify what a researcher is testing and produce data that confirms the hypothesis.The problem is particularly acute with surveys targeting younger demographics. Courtney Kennedy, vice-president of methods and innovation at Pew Research Center, noted that "bogus respondents tend to respond in the affirmative, no matter what is asked" – a positivity bias that inflates estimates. Younger respondents are also more likely to be misrepresented by fraudulent participants.As AI technology rapidly evolves, researchers face a constant challenge. "A researcher might design a clever new trap that catches today's models, but model development moves so fast that the fix is likely obsolete within months," Westwood cautioned.In response, YouGov has implemented detection methods including identity checks, device fingerprinting, and real-time threat scoring. However, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities in modern polling systems as AI continues to advance.

A recent Australian Senate inquiry has concluded that the country's climate change and energy 'information ecosystem' is fuelling conflict in communities, with misinformation and disinformation confusing the public, slowing renewable energy projects, and undermining policy responses to the climate crisis.The inquiry's final report, released on Tuesday evening, recommended that the government do more to make tech companies liable for 'psychosocial harms' spread on their platforms. It also suggested strengthening media literacy through the national curriculum and greater oversight when corporations engage with classrooms.The committee recommended more funding for research into mis- and disinformation, with a funding model to be developed for an independent effort to 'track hidden digital influence systems'. The Australian government should also sign a UN declaration, launched in Brazil in 2025, promising a series of actions aimed at combating climate mis- and dis-information.The use of artificial intelligence by groups looking to block progress on climate change was likely to further threaten the integrity of information the public received, the inquiry heard. The committee's Greens and Labor members endorsed the report, but some members felt it did not go far enough in addressing the issue.The inquiry's findings have significant implications for Australia's renewable energy future and its ability to address the climate crisis. As climate disinformation continues to evolve into a national security challenge, the Australian government must take urgent action to protect the integrity of information and promote a safe climate future.

OpenAI has made the surprising decision to discontinue its AI video generator Sora, just six months after its launch. The company announced the move on Tuesday, expressing gratitude to users who created and shared content with the tool.In a post on X, OpenAI wrote: “To everyone who created with Sora, shared it, and built community around it: thank you. What you made with Sora mattered, and we know this news is disappointing.”Sora was first made publicly available in late 2024, but it gained mainstream attention with the launch of Sora 2 and its stand-alone app last September. The app quickly rose to the top of Apple’s app store, with users creating a wide range of short videos, including some featuring Diana, Princess of Wales doing parkour and dogs driving cars. However, the video generator also faced criticism for violent and racist videos, as well as the use of copyrighted characters, deepfakes, and misinformation.OpenAI had recently outlined efforts to make the app safer, including stricter guardrails against harmful content. The company had also partnered with Disney to allow Sora users to create videos from over 200 licensed Disney characters, including those from Marvel, Pixar, and Star Wars. However, Disney has now ended its partnership with OpenAI following the discontinuation of Sora.“As the nascent AI field advances rapidly, we respect OpenAI’s decision to exit the video generation business and to shift its priorities elsewhere,” a Disney spokesperson said. OpenAI plans to share more information on the timeline for shutting down Sora and how users can save their videos.

Ofcom, the UK's broadcasting regulator, has reversed its decision not to investigate complaints of climate change denial on television and radio. This move comes after a letter from the Good Law Project (GLP) in January, which requested an explanation for the rejections. Ofcom will now reassess the complaints, which include comments from TalkTV and TalkRadio guests who made misleading statements about climate change. The complaints in question include a TalkTV guest who claimed climate change was a 'deliberate effort to create fake anxiety' and another guest who described Labour's energy policies as 'suicidal' and 'driven by pseudoscience'. Ofcom's reassessment led to the conclusion that its approach to 'due impartiality' in the broadcasts required reconsideration. Campaigners have welcomed Ofcom's decision, with the GLP spokesperson stating that 'rightwing channels have been allowed to spout dangerous climate lies, unchecked, for too long.' The GLP awaits the conclusion of the investigations, vowing to hold Ofcom accountable if it fails to take action against Talk's misinformation. Ofcom's broadcasting code states that factual programmes and that . The regulator has opened investigations into whether the TalkTV and TalkRadio programmes breached these rules. This development marks a significant shift in Ofcom's approach, as it had previously rejected over 1,000 climate-related complaints since 2020 without investigation. The regulator's decision comes amid increasing scrutiny from campaign groups and politicians, who argue that Ofcom is to deal with the scale of climate misinformation in the media.