Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

The Psychic: A Return to Supernatural TheatreSheila Gold, supposedly Britain's most accurate psychic, wants to be taken seriously by her new clients. "This is not theatre," she warns them, as she lights seven candles for a seance. This is an insider joke, as theatre is exactly what it is—a carefully constructed illusion designed to make audiences question what they believe to be true.The Creative Minds Behind the Spiritual IllusionThe Psychic marks the return of Jeremy Dyson and Andy Nyman after the spooky stage and screen success of Ghost Stories. Now the writer-directors are unnerving audiences again with grinding sound effects and sudden lighting bursts, toying with us to believe and yet not believe in voices from beyond the grave. Where Ghost Stories was an all-male affair, this one is a female-centred tale in which 18-year-old Tara tries to inherit Sheila's fairground wisdom, while matriarch Rosa does all she can to undermine the daughter she schooled.Performances That Bridge Belief and DoubtIn the lead role, Eileen Walsh does an excellent job switching from glitzy entertainer in sparkling pink jacket and matching heels to hard-bitten operator, building on the received wisdom of 10 generations of fortune tellers. The script is littered with the language of showmen, from the jossers whose fortunes they read to the oojas who mentor them, adding to the impression of ancient knowledge being passed down. This creates a rich tapestry of performance that balances skepticism with genuine supernatural possibility.A Tale of Two Halves: Strengths and ShortcomingsDyson and Nyman request that the audience keep the plot twists secret. This is reasonable in the first half where nothing is what it seems. But in the second, the ideas dry up. With little to surprise us beyond the odd jarring sound effect, the play drifts towards Victorian melodrama: too much expository dialogue, too little tension and an ending that is uncharacteristically predictable. The Psychic ultimately delivers medium-strength storytelling that entertains but doesn't fully satisfy.The Place of Spiritual Theatre in Contemporary CultureIn an age of increasing scientific skepticism, plays like The Psychic serve an important cultural function by exploring the human desire to connect with something beyond the material world. The Psychic's exploration of spiritual fraud versus genuine supernatural possibility taps into timeless questions about belief, deception, and the power of suggestion. While this particular production may not achieve the heights of Ghost Stories, it continues a tradition of theatrical supernatural storytelling that continues to captivate audiences.

The Musical Review Bank of Dave: The Musical is a tremendously likable show. The source material is the feelgood true-life story of Dave Fishwick (Sam Lupton), the Burnley businessman whose egalitarian conscience led him to step in where others had failed. Seeing his fellow townsfolk being held back for want of money, he determined to set up a non-profit bank that would treat them with trust and respect. The Story Unfolds Presented as a David and Goliath battle between an impoverished former mill town and a self-serving banking sector, it is an underdog tale with a happy ending. Following the fictionalised outline of the 2023 Netflix film, starring Rory Kinnear, it has two big plus-points for a musical: a community that pulls together and a romantic subplot between a buttoned-up London lawyer (Lucca Chadwick-Patel) and a no-nonsense local doctor (a star performance by Lauryn Redding). The Performance Director Nikolai Foster fashions an ebullient, if a tad overheated show, forever erupting into big chorus numbers on Amy Jane Cook’s amorphous bar-room set with its backdrop of Lancashire chimneys and neat integration of Duncan McLean’s video designs. Pippa Cleary’s songs are bright and engaging, drawing on gospel, soul, hip-hop and Broadway golden age. The Verdict Like the film, the north-south divide is overegged – there is even an apology for the “southern saviour narrative” – and the honest-to-goodness characters flirt with cliche. Unlike the film, it comes clean about the story’s fabrications. Such honesty is consistent with a determinedly down-to-earth show that rails against inequality while championing the possibility of change. Show Details At Lowry, Salford, until 16 May then at Curve, Leicester, 20–30 May

The Unseen Robin Hood: Director John Irvin on His Anti-Thatcher Film Thirty-five years ago, two films about the legend of Robin Hood – stealer from the rich, giver to the poor – met and duelled in cinemas; we all know who won, Kevin Costner’s big-budget blockbuster, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves. But what about the other one? It was titled simply Robin Hood, directed by John Irvin and starring Patrick Bergin in the title role alongside a pre-Pulp Fiction Uma Thurman as Maid Marian. The Aim Was to Give Kevin Costner's Version a Good Kicking “It was very much a stand-alone film with the aim of giving Kevin Costner’s version a good kicking if we could,” says Irvin, now 85. “The studio wanted to go immediately because they wanted to pre-empt Costner.” The Data Analysis: A Modest Budget and Box Office Return The film had a modest budget and was released internationally, but in the US it premiered as a three-hour TV film in May 1991. Costner’s film took just short of $400m in worldwide receipts and became the year’s summer blockbuster. The Impact Analysis: Anti-Thatcherism and Social Commentary Irvin admitted: “The production was tricky. It was cold and wet. It was winter, so Robin Hood couldn’t be in ‘Merry England’. All the trees were bare, so nobody could hide and ambush people. “Quite serendipitously, we found in Cheshire, near the castle, a whole warren of salt mines. I thought it was perfect because it was underground. It was my attempt to give a more honest version of Robin Hood during the middle ages. Around the time of the film there were poll tax [protests] in England. There is a sort of underlying current of anti-Thatcherism in the movie, which was picked up by one or two critics. We tried, without being too on-the-nose, to make it relevant to Thatcher’s England. It was subversive, but in a very, I hope, subtle and nuanced way.” The Prediction: A Legacy Reevaluated “I think it holds up well. The story of Robin Hood seems to be woven into our national psyche. When there’s a sense of oppression, it’s good to have a saviour like Robin Hood, who’s going to give two fingers to the establishment.”

The Climate Crisis: A Call to Action Strip away the politics, and the climate crisis debate isn’t complicated. We’re changing the planet in ways that are “damaging and dangerous”, and every country will be affected. “No one can opt out.” Margaret Thatcher's Warning Those quotes might sound as if they came from a leftwing Scandinavian leader, but they are, in fact, from Margaret Thatcher. Speaking to the UN general assembly in 1989, Britain’s then prime minister tore into world leaders and warned that there was “no good squabbling over who is responsible or who should pay”. The Cracks in Climate Consensus While Reform UK’s Richard Tice has said it is “absolute garbage” to claim that human activity is the main cause of the climate crisis, companies he’s led have boasted of “zero net emissions” buildings, some featuring solar panels and electric vehicle charging points. One company of which he is chief executive told shareholders last year that those solar panels generating electricity were “saving hundreds of tonnes of CO2 per annum”. The Data Analysis 84% of Britons say the climate is changing 68% want government action The Impact Analysis On the climate, the country isn’t divided, it’s decided – and miles ahead of any politics dragging it backwards. This isn’t a fight we need. We’ve shown we can agree on the goal and get results. Letting that consensus slip helps no one. The Prediction The local elections this week will determine whether progress accelerates or stalls. This is the choice between ambition and procrastination, between getting things built or finding reasons to block them. Labour's Climate Leadership Labour is now Britain’s climate party, not by accident but by choice, because we’re prepared to build. Our task is clear: electrify our economy and take oil and gas out of our veins as our lifeblood. While others argue or block, we’re delivering the biggest transformation in how this country is powered in a generation.

The Rejected Media Credential The plan to fly to Las Vegas to cover what the Enhanced Games claims is the “next frontier of human performance” ended with a short email sent at 7.02pm on Friday. “After careful consideration, we are unable to approve your media credential request for this year’s event,” it said. “Due to the high volume of applications and limited media capacity, we could not accommodate all requests … thank you again for your interest and understanding.” The Concerns About the Enhanced Games Admittedly, the rejection didn’t come entirely out of the blue. Unlike most sports organisations, the Enhanced Games had a pre-screening process which led to a nice PR man calling me a few days beforehand. His opening gambit? To point out the Guardian’s negativity towards the event. The Questions I'd Ask Why, he then asked, weren’t we criticising others in the longevity space? Er, because they aren’t running an event dubbed the Steroid Olympics? What about the basics? Are the tracks legal, the timing devices reputable, the officials pulled off the streets? You claim that the athletes are leaving “the old system behind for a new era of honesty and science”. But do you really believe that steroids, human growth hormone and EPO are safe? Can athletes sue the Enhanced Games? Many of you have stressed the benefits of taking banned drugs. But have you experienced any side-effects? What is your response to former athletes who say you are a dangerous influence on kids? The Future of the Enhanced Games Personally, I believe such talk is nonsense. But I don’t dismiss the Enhanced Games out of hand. I spoke to one person in the health-tech space, who has dealt with its founders, and he pointed out they are smart people and billionaires who tend to get what they want.

The Shift in McIlroy's Stance on LIV Golfers Rory McIlroy is no longer opposed to LIV Golf players returning to the PGA Tour, but he said Friday that “it’s a question of if they do want to come back”. McIlroy's comments indicate a softening of his previous stance on golfers who joined LIV. The Uncertainty Surrounding LIV Golf McIlroy said the answer will probably depend on what happens with LIV’s financial situation in the coming months. Last month, Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund pulled the plug on future funding for LIV Golf, which had lured away stars including Jon Rahm and Bryson DeChambeau with lucrative, guaranteed contracts. The Data Analysis: Financial Implications $500m: The amount Bryson DeChambeau has reportedly asked for in a new deal with LIV Golf. The Impact Analysis: Golf's Future Landscape The PGA Tour recently offered a temporary path back for some LIV players. Brooks Koepka took advantage of the opportunity. Rahm and Tyrrell Hatton are among the players who remain under contract with LIV beyond this season. McIlroy expressed skepticism about the rival tour raising enough money to continue in its current form. The Prediction: What's Next for LIV Golfers “If you want to be the most competitive golfer you can be, this is the place to be,” McIlroy said of the PGA Tour. “And if you don’t want to play here, I think that says something about you.” The PGA Championship is next week outside Philadelphia, with DeChambeau, Rahm, and Koepka all set to participate.

The Allure of Celebrity Traitors If it were any other show, the sight of comedian Alan Carr sobbing under the burden of his dishonesty may have been enough to put off any celebrity thinking about accepting a place in the perilous Traitors' castle. Yet the second season of Celebrity Traitors, being filmed at its now famous Highlands retreat, has managed to attract one of the most high-profile casts ever assembled for a reality TV show. A Star-Studded Lineup Actors who open West End shows and others with Oscar nominations to their name will be plotting alongside the nation's most in-demand comedians and writers – and the odd fashion icon. The starry lineup was announced as filming began, amid speculation it would have been too hard to keep under wraps. The likes of Richard E Grant, Michael Sheen, and Jerry Hall will compete alongside Miranda Hart, Romesh Ranganathan, and James Acaster. The Appeal of the Game According to Stephen Lambert, the chief executive of the show's producer, Studio Lambert, the reason most celebrities gave for signing up to Celebrity Traitors was their love for the game itself. "Almost without exception, the first reason is that they're fans of the show," he said. "Beyond that, the answers are surprisingly personal: people who feel they've spent their careers in a particular public lane and want to show a different side of themselves; people whose children or grandchildren have effectively dared them into it; people who are fascinated by the psychology of the game and want to see how they'd hold up under pressure." The Casting Process TV insiders pointed to the show's other in-built advantages, including its intense but not too long filming schedule, and lack of embarrassment factor. "It's got everything going for it and I think that's why it's attracted an amazing cast," said Peter Fincham, a former BBC One controller. "However big the celebrity, to say 'I'm going on the Celebrity Traitors', there's no embarrassment." The Future of Reality TV The fact that so many big names have signed up to be faithfuls and traitors should not take away the skill of the show's casting. "The perfect cast isn't the most famous one, it's the one where everyone brings something different to the table," said Lambert. With a cast made up of actors, comedians, and fashion icons, the second season of Celebrity Traitors is set to be just as compelling as the first.

The Evolution of Male Dance “We always thought BalletBoyz was a really stupid name. We wanted not to be BalletBoyz.” says William Trevitt, founder of the company called, guess what, BalletBoyz. It was the BBC that landed them with that tag, when then-Royal Ballet dancers Trevitt and Michael Nunn made a cheeky and revealing backstage documentary at London’s Royal Opera House. Breaking Down Barriers BalletBoyz is heading out on tour this month to celebrate its 25th anniversary. In those two-and-a-half decades, Nunn and Trevitt have done a lot for the image of men dancing (they have had women in their shows over the years, too, it must be said). It was never their intention to make a statement, it was always just about great dance, but still, here were two straight men who danced together – and later a whole company of young men – and commissioned a new repertoire that wasn’t about romantic partnering, but “two matching energies and exploring the balance between them”, as Trevitt puts it. The Data Analysis 227% rise in boys applying to the Royal Ballet’s Lower School from 1999-2000 intake to a peak just before Covid. 349% rise in girls applying to the Royal Ballet’s Lower School over the same period. 3 to 4% of candidates taking International Society of Teachers of Dancing (ISTD) exams identify as male. The Impact Analysis “It’s cool to dance now, isn’t it,” says Layton Williams, who was the ninth Billy Elliot on stage, and more recently a runner-up on Strictly with pro partner Nikita Kuzmin. “My nephew is dancing on TikTok with his mates, and he’s a proper lad.” The Prediction “There’s a persistent misconception that boys aren’t interested in dance, but we consistently see a strong appetite,” says Laura Nicholson from the industry body One Dance UK. With initiatives like BalletBoyz’s workshops in schools and the success of shows like Diversity on TV, it seems that the stigma around boys who dance may finally be shifting.

The Misstated Emissions Developers working for Google have significantly misstated how much carbon two proposed AI datacentres will contribute to the UK’s total emissions in planning documents reviewed by the Guardian. The tech company wants to build two huge datacentres – one 52-hectare (130 acre) project in Thurrock and another at an airfield in North Weald, both in Essex. To do so, developers are required to submit planning documents calculating how much carbon these projects will emit as a proportion of the UK’s total carbon footprint. The Calculation Error In both cases, they appear to have compared one year of the proposed datacentre’s emissions with the UK’s entire five-year carbon budget, understating the significance of their emissions by a factor of five, according to experts at the tech justice nonprofit Foxglove. Google's Thurrock datacentre claimed its emissions would amount to 0.033% of the UK’s budgeted carbon footprint between 2028 and 2032, but it will actually be 0.165% of the total. The North Weald datacentre said it would emit 0.043% of the UK’s total carbon budget from 2033 to 2037, but it will actually emit 0.215% of the total. The Impact Analysis These apparent misstatements are another example of a pile-up of faulty calculations surrounding AI development and its environmental footprint in the UK. The three developments will account for more than 1% of the UK’s carbon budget in 2033, equivalent to the emissions of a mid-sized city such as Bristol. The Prediction “Google has serious questions to answer about its dubious datacentre pollution figures,” said Tim Squirrell, the head of strategy for Foxglove. “Unless they can explain themselves, it looks like they are seriously misleading the council and the public over the climate pollution their facility will cause.”