Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

The New Era of Veteran FootballersAfter playing at Qatar 2022 at age 35, US national team defender Tim Ream thought it was "pretty unlikely" he could play in another World Cup. But he decided he would at least try to stay in the game as long as possible. "Because for me, it's about pushing boundaries, pushing myself, pushing the limits of what I can physically and emotionally handle," he told Al Jazeera.Last week, Ream was named as the US's captain for the upcoming football tournament in North America and, at 38, is the oldest ever outfield player in a US World Cup squad. "To be given the honour and the opportunity to wear the captain's armband in a home World Cup is incredible," he said.Ream is one of several outfield players in their late 30s and beyond at the 2026 World Cup; including Portugal superstar Cristiano Ronaldo, 41, the 40-year-olds Luka Modric and Edin Dzeko, Yuto Nagatomo, 39, and Argentina legend Lionel Messi, who turns 39 later this month.The Science Behind Extended CareersEvolving sport science plays a significant role in extending career longevity – the days when "recovery" meant having a few beers after the game are long gone, and many players now extoll all kinds of developments from lymphatic draining to cryotherapy.Huge amounts of data measuring biomarkers from heart rate variability and muscle oxygenation to hormonal fluctuations and inflammation are now available, including from wearable technology. But experts argue that sport science is just part of a complex system of interlocking factors needed to extend longevity in football, including culture, relationships, a learning mindset, luck, resources, and the motivation to keep going into a fifth decade."This question is always about people," Vlatko Vucetic, a professor of kinesiology at the University of Zagreb who has worked as a personal trainer with Croatian and Real Madrid star midfielder Modric for more than 10 years, told Al Jazeera.The Statistical Shift in Football LongevityFootballers tend to peak before the age of 30, with research suggesting a general decline in the early 30s in terms of speed, power and explosiveness, although endurance fades more slowly. As players age, recovery takes longer, and they also become more susceptible to injuries. Football has also gotten much faster and more physical over the last few decades, and the number of matches at the elite level has increased dramatically.According to Transfermarkt.com, only 15 players aged 35 or above appeared in the Premier League this season out of more than 500 players. However, there is evidence that the median age of footballers may be increasing, while the number of outfield players playing into their late 30s and early 40s at the upcoming World Cup is striking. Before this tournament, Cameroon's Roger Milla – who scored at USA 1994 aged 42 – was the only outfield player in their 40s to play at a World Cup.How Aging Stars Are Transforming Football CultureBen Rosenblatt was the lead performance coach for the England men's team for seven years and is the founder and director of 292 Performance, a sport consultancy firm that trains and advises elite individuals and organisations. He told Al Jazeera that advances in sport science and data collection – and an increased focus on health and wellness culture inside and outside the game – have helped extend careers in football."Within the game, there is more attention to detail over the last two decades being placed on an understanding and knowledge around training science and in particular, how to schedule organised training sessions to optimise athletes' performance and reduce injury risk – which is obviously going to be a big survival factor for players," he said.While Rosenblatt says longevity relies on "the amalgamation of all the different tools, resources, culture and behavioural shifts that are taking place within the game", the fundamentals remain crucial; training, recovery, sleep, lifestyle, nutrition and hydration."It's about doing the stuff that's quite boring and basic 99 percent of the time," he said.The Future of Athletic Longevity in FootballLooking ahead, Rosenblatt says putting the huge amount of available data together to create a more holistic picture of a player could be "transformative" for longevity. "That's kind of the Holy Grail, because you can give clarity to a manager or an owner game by game or across the course of a season about what the player is capable of delivering, and then obviously what development they require," he said.And extending longevity means establishing routines, discipline, and what works early on. "I know so many players who, towards the end of their career, tried to find a routine and they couldn't stick with it because they hadn't done it early enough," Ream said. "Find these things and get into them early, because it'll help you in the long run."Veterans playing into middle age will often adapt their game to compensate for slowing legs with assets like enhanced vision. "I think my biggest improvement is being able to see things as they're developing, and as they're happening, but then also understanding and adapting to different coaches," Ream said. "I think that's where you have to understand the interpersonal side with this game, because it's all about connections, it's all about communication, it's all about relationships on and off the field."

A Medical Miracle in War-Torn YemenIn the besieged city of Taiz, southwest Yemen, a young girl named Noor Majid lies recovering from surgery to treat her atrial septal defect (ASD), commonly known as "hole in the heart." Ten-year-old Noor has had this condition since birth, causing constant breathing problems and chronic exhaustion. Her surgery is part of a larger medical revolution taking place in Yemen, where the Cardiac and Vascular Diseases and Kidney Transplant Center is providing life-saving care to patients who would otherwise have no options.The Growth of Yemen's Premier Medical FacilityThe Cardiac and Vascular Diseases and Kidney Transplant Center in Taiz represents one of Yemen's most significant medical achievements in recent years. Founded in July 2021 by Professor Abudar al-Ganadi, the facility has grown exponentially since its inception. What began with just six beds on one floor has expanded to 131 beds, including 23 intensive care beds. The center now performs 500 operations monthly, including 50 adult cardiac surgeries, 70 vascular surgeries, and 300 cardiac catheterization procedures—a dramatic increase from the initial 3-5 surgeries performed each month during its first year of operation.Transforming Healthcare Economics in YemenThe medical center has not only transformed healthcare outcomes but also economics for Yemeni patients. Complex procedures that would cost approximately $20,000 abroad—including travel, accommodation, and living expenses—are performed at the Taiz center for just $5,000, with patients paying only $2,000 out of pocket. The remaining costs are covered by benefactors such as the Hayel Saeed Anam Group, Al-Zailai Company, and Al-Kuraimi Bank. According to Dr. Nader al-Hammadi, approximately 1,000 of the 1,500 open-heart surgeries performed at the center would have been done abroad if the facility had not existed, saving patients both financial hardship and the complications of international travel.A New Era for Specialized Medical Care in YemenThe establishment of this medical center has marked a paradigm shift in healthcare delivery in Yemen. Despite the country's ongoing conflict, which has devastated health infrastructure nationwide, the Taiz center has conducted 164 kidney transplants, 1,450 open-heart surgeries, nearly 4,000 vascular operations, 4,340 catheterization procedures, and 1,500 urology operations since opening. Most recently, the center announced Yemen's first three liver transplants—a milestone that could pave the way for sustainable treatment of liver conditions in the country. This achievement has garnered international attention and positions Yemen as capable of providing advanced medical care despite its challenging circumstances.The Future of Healthcare in YemenLooking ahead, Professor al-Ganadi emphasizes cautious optimism regarding the center's expansion, particularly in liver transplantation. "We launched this programme quietly and cautiously with two cases, then a third one, and we will continue gradually. We will not announce preliminary results until after 10 transplants, then 50, just as we did with the cardiac programme," he explains. The center's success has not only provided critical medical care to Yemenis but has also created a model for delivering specialized healthcare in conflict zones. As the center continues to grow and develop new capabilities, it stands as a testament to the resilience of Yemen's medical professionals and their commitment to improving healthcare outcomes in the face of tremendous challenges.

Conservationists are racing through Queensland’s rain‑forested creeks to locate the rare Conondale spiny crayfish, a relic that has survived for millions of years but now teeters on the brink of extinction.The Race to Locate the Elusive Conondale Spiny CrayfishAt an undisclosed creek in the hinterland of Queensland’s Sunshine Coast, Ollie Scully wades barefoot with a torch, searching for the prized crustacean. After hours of scouring the rocky bottom, a juvenile about 15 cm long emerges, its claw still regenerating after a likely encounter with a metre‑long eel – a known predator that can drop its claws in self‑defence.“It’s a Conondale … one of the giants,” Scully notes, describing the creature as “incredibly captivating.” The find underscores the fragility of a species that has persisted for roughly 100 million years yet now confronts unprecedented threats.Escalating Threat Numbers: From Three to Thirty‑Six Species on the Threatened ListAustralia hosts 52 known species of spiny crayfish, all endemic.In 2019, only 3 species were listed as threatened.Today, that figure has risen to 36 species, with more expected to join the list.These statistics illustrate a rapid slide toward endangerment, driven by habitat loss, altered waterways and increasing predation pressures.Why Australia’s Freshwater Giants Face a Rapidly Changing HabitatEcologist Dr Nick Whiterod of the Coorong Lower Lakes and Murray Mouth Research Centre emphasizes that most Australians are unaware of the “spinies” lurking beneath their feet. He points to accelerating climate change, more frequent bushfires and human‑induced habitat modification as the primary catalysts of decline.“They’ve withstood everything Australia has thrown at them, but the rate of change is escalating in terms of climate, fire and what humans have done to alter their habitat,” Whiterod warns.What the Future Holds for the Spiny CrayfishBoth Scully and Whiterod call for a coordinated national effort, combining genetic research, habitat restoration and public education. Without decisive action, the spiny crayfish could disappear from Australia’s freshwater ecosystems, erasing a lineage that dates back to the age of dinosaurs.Continued monitoring, protection of critical creek habitats and stronger legislative safeguards are identified as the most viable pathways to ensure these ancient creatures survive for generations to come.

The Controversial Non-Runner DecisionHow long must Epsom wait to catch a break? The main elements were all in place for a feelgood running of the Derby on Saturday: a double-figure field, the major trial winners all in the lineup, and fresh incentives launched to encourage walk-up punters back to the infield. The weather gods, though, had other ideas.Would Christmas Day have won on good-to-firm ground? Perhaps. Every horse has its chance, after all. But he was surely not a 7-1 shot had the rain not arrived, having finished only third in the Dante Stakes in May, when he was running on ground without "soft" in the description for the first time. As Ronan Whelan, Christmas Day's rider, put it, the "stars aligned" for Aidan O'Brien's fourth-string, who beat both James J Braddock, the third horse home on Saturday, and Pierre Bonnard, the seventh, on soft ground at Leopardstown in April. As things stand, though, it is hard to see him as anything more than a very average winner of the Derby, and his next race, which could be as soon as the Irish Derby later this month, will do more to establish his place in the three-year-old generation.The Non-Runner Ruling and Its AftermathIf or when he next runs into Maltese Cross, Saturday's runner-up, on good ground or better, my money would be on William Haggas's colt to reverse the form. Tom Marquand had little choice but to drop him into midfield from his wide draw in stall one, and he was the only runner to make significant ground on the winner, who was perfectly positioned throughout, in the closing stages, despite clearly hating the ground.For as long as humans race thoroughbreds, though, Christmas Day will be in the record books as the 2026 Derby winner, so fair play to the "lads" in the Coolmore Stud syndicate for letting him take his chance. And respect too to the punters who read back through his form, pondered the weather forecast and backed him down to single-figure odds, from as big as 25-1 after the final declarations and draw on Wednesday.Respect, though, is no substitute for hard cash, and many of Christmas Day's backers suffered the post-race slap in the face of a 25p Rule 4 deduction in every pound of their winnings after the stewards decided that Benvenuto Cellini, the 3-1 favourite, had been denied a fair start and should be declared a non-runner. Benvenuto Cellini, O'Brien's first-string with Ryan Moore holding the reins, had a hind leg on the inside rail of his starting stall when the gates opened. He was slow to stride as a result and eventually crossed the line in 10th having never threatened to land a blow on his stable companion.This according to Shaun Parker, the British Horseracing Authority's head of stewarding, was enough for the stewards to decide that Benvenuto Cellini's chance had been "materially affected", and that the officials did not "feel we had any choice but to declare him a non-runner". The rule covering Saturday's incident dates back to April 2024, before which horses could be declared non-runners only as a result of faulty action of the starting stalls or if they were riderless at the off. It has been called into action several times since – last month, Cashbox was declared a non-runner at Windsor in near-identical circumstances – but ruling out the 3-1 favourite for Flat racing's showpiece Classic is clearly of a very different order of magnitude.Financial Implications of the DecisionThe rule, as is the case with many of those in racing, is designed with punters in mind, and ensuring that they get a fair run for their money. As Parker framed it on Saturday: "If you'd backed the favourite and that's happened to you at the start, it would be very difficult to explain why we didn't think that it had materially affected his chances and they'd actually lost their money." Benvenuto Cellini's backers were no doubt happy to get their stake money back after seeing their horse trail home down the field, and the betting firms that were willing to take a significant hit by waiving the Rule 4 deduction, including Ladbrokes, Coral and Boylesports, deserve a name-check.In the view of this longtime punter, at least, it was a poor decision, made as the result of a rule seeking to micromanage events that should fall instead into the realm of tough racing luck. All manner of incidents at the start can "materially affect" a horse's chance. It may rear a split-second before the stalls open. Will that be sufficient to see a horse declared a non-runner at Royal Ascot next week? And if not, why not? The stewards' decision also not only cost most backers of Christmas Day money, it cost the sport money given racing draws significant funding from both turnover and betting firms' gross profits, and the Derby is one of the biggest betting races of the year.Impact on Horse Racing's FutureThe "fair start" rule was introduced with good intentions, but while no one enjoys backing an unlucky loser it is an inevitable part of betting on horses. What punters absolutely detest, however, is backing a winner at a good price and then losing a decent chunk of their anticipated return. As for the Classic weekend as a whole, Saturday's weather washed away any hopes of a 60,000-attendance over the two days, but the attendance of 22,557 for the Derby was the highest since 2022 and the two-day total of 48,261 was 28% up on last year.A promising year one, in other words, in the Jockey Club's £6m, five-year plan to revive the Derby. And the weather, we hope, can only be better next year.

The Exhibition That Makes You Cringe and Laugh"It is like the invasion of the bunny body snatchers," says JT Thompson, the former lead singer of the 1970s US rock band Peter Rabbitt, as he looks at what is regarded as one of the world's worst record covers. The 1979 album Roadstar shows all five members of the California rock band with their faces morphed on to rabbit bodies, with Thompson emerging, like a terrible dream, smiling from a top hat.What started as a personal collection has evolved into a traveling exhibition that has become something of a phenomenon. Four years ago, the first Worst Record Covers in the World exhibition appeared in Huddersfield, and since then has been displayed at galleries and festivals across the country. Currently, it's at the Mansfield Museum and Art Gallery, with plans to appear at the Edinburgh fringe later this year.The Curator's Quest for Terrible ArtThe exhibition's curator, Steve Goldman, traces his obsession back to the Peter Rabbitt album. "I bought the rabbit album 40 years ago for 10p because it had such a bad cover," Goldman said. "It made me laugh ... I was in hysterics." After losing the album but never forgetting it, Goldman was able to track down a copy when the internet came along."When it arrived it was one of the happiest moments of my life," he said. "That evening I said to my family, 'do you know what, I think I'll start collecting crap LP covers'." Goldman's simple rule of thumb is that if it makes him laugh, he collects it.A Collection of Musical MisstepsAmong the hundreds of albums on display are notable examples of questionable artistic choices:Roadstar by Peter Rabbitt - featuring band members with rabbit bodiesOil and Vinegar by Dave McKenna/The Wilbur Little Quarter - with a naked couple and their disturbing use of what could be chardSongs for Gay Dogs by Paddy RobertsDo You Want to Touch Me by Johnny CarrollKris Jensen Sings: TortureAll My Friends Are Dead by Freddie Gage - showing the Southern Baptist evangelist kneeling at a graveGoldman's current favorite is All MyFriends Are Dead, which he bought for £110. "It is the most expensive album I've bought – £110 – but it's worth every penny," he said.The Evolution of Bad Album ArtMost of the albums in the collection are from the 1970s and 1980s, but Goldman points out that terrible album covers continue to be made. He cites Norway's Satanic Panic Attack, Handgemeng, in which the five band members have stripped naked to mournfully cuddle up on a rug. "They just look comical," said Goldman, laughing.The exhibition has become a cultural touchstone, with visitors often recognizing musicians they've worked with. Thompson, 74, visited the Mansfield show and recognized people he had worked with over the years, including Dee Snider from Twisted Sister about to gorge on a cow bone and an almost-naked Ted Nugent with Terminator-like guitar arms.The Future of Terrible Album CoversAs the exhibition continues to travel, Goldman hopes to expand the collection while maintaining its appeal to all ages. Because venues like Mansfield Museum attract many children, some of the more risque covers from Goldman's collection are excluded from display, such as Letzte Naach by the German folk singer Kingsize Dick and Let Me Touch Him by the Minister's Quartet.Visitors are encouraged to vote for their favorite worst album cover and participate in polls of more divisive works, like Prince's Lovesexy album featuring the singer reclining naked on a giant lily. "Terrible or genius?" the exhibition seems to ask."My favourite activity during exhibitions is to watch people's reactions," Goldman said. "I hope people will laugh." The exhibition continues to grow, with Goldman constantly discovering new additions to his collection of what he calls "crap LP covers" – a celebration of artistic choices that went terribly, wonderfully wrong.

The Final Showdown at Roland-Garros Salut à tous et bienvenue à Roland-Garros 2026 – dernier jour! The French Open men's singles final is set to feature Alexander Zverev against Flavio Cobolli, with both players having taken different paths to reach this prestigious final. Zverev's Quest for Grand Slam Glory Alexander Zverev has probably spent most of his life assuming that, at some point, he'd become a grand slam champion – let's be real, his demeanour has never hidden it. And though he lost the 2020 US Open final to Dominic Thiem from two sets up, followed by a five-set final to Carlos Alcaraz in the 2024 edition of this competition, the feeling persisted that, though he struggled to find his best game when he needed it most, his time would come. Except he then made the 2025 final in Melbourne, endured an exhibition spanking from Jannik Sinner, and something within him changed – how couldn't it? He was good, but he was significantly less good than the two best, fading as they grew, and there was no sense he could best both in a two-week major. The Opportunity of a Lifetime Which makes this fortnight the opportunity of a lifetime, Alcaraz injured and Sinner beaten by illness. The question now, though, is whether that inspires him or ratchets pressure up to such paralysing degree it prevents him from performing; neither outcome would be surprising. The Underdog's Rise: Flavio Cobolli And, though many seem to consider a final against Flavio Cobolli to be as close to as gimme as you can get, that is not really the case. Of course, Zverev is good enough to win in straight sets, but he faces an opponent who, it's been clear for several years now, has the talent to challenge the elite. His forehand is a tremendous shot, he returns superbly and moves beautifully, perhaps the quickest player on tour. But more than that, he competes like he means it and, though of course he'll be nervous, he won't freeze – partly because he doesn't carry the weight of expectation, mainly because he's just one of those many sportsfolk built differently to the rest of us, the warmth of his embrace turning fear into opportunity. He will be ready. The Cultural Significance of Sport Broadly speaking, we invented sport because we wanted to know who was the fastest, the strongest and the best. But that was a while ago now, and the behemoth we nurtured now serves an entirely different purpose: in a fragmented, atomised, divided world, sport is company and in sport is community, a real-time, real-life friend and family. If we're sad, lonely or bored, we know sport has our back, caring, nurturing and teaching with gentle omnipresence, asking nothing in return. If we're happy, in company and engaged, we know sport has our back, caring, nurturing and teaching with gentle omnipresence, asking nothing in return. Anticipation for the Final For these reasons, even the worst sport is better than the best almost everything else – and verily has the French Open 2026 been not that. Over the last fortnight, we've had bestowed upon us a succession of barely believable matches and outcomes, our days enriched and our existences affirmed by a raft of compelling stories that remind us how to feel, a joy shared across the world – so too the knowledge that we'll be talking about what we've lived for as long as we live. That is a precious, restorative elixir to carry with us … but now we want the final we and the tournament deserve. What to Expect And so will we, caring for ourselves by caring about this, the experience of being us made better by the unique captivation of Roland-Garros 2026. Chauette! On y va! Play: 3pm local, 2pm BST

The Impact of High Aviation Taxes on UK Tourism The cost of travel to and around the UK is keeping millions of tourists away and slowing economic growth, the boss of British Airways said, as he urged a rethink of aviation taxes. The Event Details The airline’s chief executive, Sean Doyle, said the UK had some of the highest aviation taxes in the world and was falling behind countries such as Japan, France and Germany in boosting its inbound tourism. Air passenger duty across most flights was raised by 15% in April, up to £8 a passenger on domestic flights, £15 for European departures, and up to £253 in premium economy seats on long-haul flights. The Data Analysis The UK would not hit ambitious targets for domestic tourism without making travel easier and more affordable, Doyle added. The government has set a target of welcoming 50 million international visitors to the UK by 2030, up from about 40 million tourists at present. The Impact Analysis Doyle warned that unless the affordability issue is addressed, the UK will not reach its target. He cited the high cost of travel, including aviation taxes and rail ticketing, as a major factor. “What’s the biggest challenge in the country at the minute? It’s growth. And what should policy be doing? It should be unblocking growth. If you want to promote tourism and aviation … the last thing you do to encourage that expansion is put the cost of it up,” Doyle said. The Prediction Doyle also warned that the government’s backing for Heathrow’s third runway in pursuit of economic growth could backfire if the airport developed its own scheme at the cost of airlines paying higher charges and reducing their own investments. BA and other airlines have urged the government to pursue a cheaper alternative scheme for a third runway than the current £33bn preferred option proposed by the airport.

The Rise of Anti-Tech Extremism in the AI AgeWhen a 20-year-old man from Texas was arrested earlier this year for allegedly trying to burn down OpenAI's headquarters and Sam Altman's house, authorities found an anti-AI manifesto alongside his lighter and a jug of kerosene. This incident is part of a spate of attacks that has caused alarm among researchers, the tech industry and law enforcement about the rise of anti-tech extremism.In April, an Italian "nature pilled" Instagram influencer was arrested in Rome and charged with plotting a series of anti-tech attacks that took inspiration from Ted "The Unabomber" Kaczynski. Two self-described "ecofascists" that carried out a deadly anti-Muslim attack on a mosque in San Diego last month also cited "AI slop" and JD Vance's ties to Palantir as motivations for their violence in their manifesto. An Indianapolis city councilor woke up earlier this year to gunshots being fired into his home before finding a note that read "NO DATA CENTERS".The growing public backlash to the tech industry's rapid rollout of artificial intelligence has taken many, mostly-non violent forms such as local communities organizing against datacenters and political candidates promising increased oversight. Yet at the fringes, researchers say grievances against the AI industry and its leaders are animating old violent extremist movements and fomenting new ones."AI is becoming this driver of political violence, and that's a very new phenomenon," said Jordyn Abrams, a researcher at the Program on Extremism at George Washington University.AI as a Unifying Factor for Extremist GroupsWhile much of the early public discussion around generative AI and extremism focused on how malign actors like terrorist groups could misuse products such as ChatGPT for propaganda purposes or plotting attacks, there is more recent attention given to how the AI industry as a whole can radicalize people. What motivates someone to extremist violence might not be a conversation with a chatbot, researchers say, but the society-wide disruption, narrative of existential threat and lack of accountability that has come with the AI boom.In the same way that AI has come to pervade many facets of modern life, the technology has also filtered into the way that extremists think about the world. Whether it is violent anti-government groups opposing mass surveillance, ecofascists with environmental grievances, neo-Nazi accelerationists bent on collapsing critical tech infrastructure or the man who allegedly targeted Altman's house worried about superpowerful artificial intelligence destroying humanity, AI has become a fixation across the extremist spectrum."It really transcends these left-right dichotomies," said Yannick Veilleux-Lepage, an associate professor at the Royal Military College of Canada. "We're seeing a lot of different groups, a lot of different ideologies being framed through a lens of anti-AI."The Unprecedented Speed of AI TransformationThe modern anti-tech movement has a long lineage. Periods of technological change are historically accompanied by backlash from the people most affected, with researchers often pointing to the early 19th-century luddite rebellion of British textile workers smashing automated knitting machines as they demanded more labor rights. The next 200 years brought waves of violent labor disputes and political violence that accompanied tech's market disruptions, uneven accumulation of wealth and disenfranchisement of workers.In the 1990s, there was cultural pushback against the rise of the personal computer and the fear of how it would disrupt society. Common complaints included fears of replacing human workers, environmental harm and crumbling healthy social structures."Haven't you heard? It wants your job. It peddles you smut. It corrupts your kids. It's cold, sterile, inhuman. Suddenly, it's okay to hate your computer," read a New York Magazine cover story from 1995 on the "New Luddites".The same year as New York Magazine ran its cover story, the Washington Post and the New York Times published the Unabomber's anti-tech manifesto, a 35,000-word screed against industrial society that has proliferated online in the years since and become the closest thing that anti-tech extremism has to a foundational text.What separates anti-AI extremism from these previous waves of tech backlash, researchers say, is partly the speed and scale of how AI is bringing about economic, social and political change."Not only are these whole-of-society changes and not only are they really disruptive, they're happening really quickly," Veilleux-Lepage said. "There isn't time for people to build resilience or to inoculate themselves from these changes".The AI industry's longstanding talking points – that the technology will revolutionize the world, if not end it – also lend themselves to a radicalizing narrative that AI poses an existential threat and must be stopped at all costs. When Veilleux-LePage gives talks to policymakers about anti-tech extremism, one of his slides simply features a series of quotes from CEOs."In order to radicalize people, you don't actually need to have theorists or ideologues that are calling people to violence against AI, because the tech CEOs are doing a pretty good case," Veilleux-LePage said.Corporate Response and Security ConcernsAltman has often framed the changes AI will bring as something that may be difficult, but is ultimately both positive – above all, he describes the change as inevitable."I expect some really bad stuff to happen because of the technology which also has happened with previous technologies," Altman said on venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz's podcast last year.While tech CEOs are publicly optimistic about the resilience of society and the change that AI will bring about, it is also clear that they are privately concerned with the threat of political violence. Spending on personal security for executives has ballooned over the past five years amid incidents such as the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, while tech leaders such as Elon Musk now pour millions into their own protection. SpaceX revealed in its IPO filing earlier this year that it paid $4m last year to Musk's private security firm, double what it had spent only two years before.There are signs over the past year that the AI industry is shifting its rhetoric as it grapples with widespread public distrust. Altman claimed last month that AI would probably not lead to the "jobs apocalypse" that he once discussed, even as companies like Meta lay off tens of thousands of workers. OpenAI and Anthropic have meanwhile both announced funds and thinktanks this year aimed at helping civil institutions adapt to AI, with OpenAI's non-profit organization committing $250m to grants for programs that help workers navigate AI upheaval.Major AI firms are hiring national security, intelligence, and weapons experts to monitor threats and misuse of their technology, including some with a background in extremism and counter-terrorism research. OpenAI's head of intelligence previously worked as one of the foremost academic experts on the Islamic State and wrote a book on the group's belief that it was bringing about the apocalypse. OpenAI and Anthropic did not respond to requests for interviews with their intelligence or security experts.The Accountability Gap and Future RisksThe closing off of legitimate avenues to address public opposition to AI, as well as the feeling that the technology is being forced upon society, is creating what researchers describe as a gap in accountability that can further incentivize terrorism and political violence.Donald Trump, in alignment with tech leaders, issued an executive order last year attempting to block any state-level legislation that would rein in AI development and has said that nothing will slow down the US in the global AI race. Tech billionaires are also pouring millions of dollars into lobbying and political spending in an attempt to prevent regulation of AI."When authorities are too busy, or just don't care enough, to regulate and take action, then people affected are going to take action," said Mauro Lubrano, a lecturer at the University of Bath and author of Stop the Machines: The Rise of Anti-Technology Extremism.Federal law enforcement documents acquired by Wired and the Intercept show that US authorities are increasingly monitoring anti-tech movements, while authorities have declared they will aggressively prosecute violent attacks. Following the attempted arson at Altman's house earlier this year, authorities vowed that "the FBI will not tolerate threats against our nation's innovation leaders".Yet researchers warn that authorities risk conflating the nationwide protests and calls for increased regulation of AI with more fringe, anti-tech extremist views, which is both inaccurate and counterproductive. Programs aimed at mass surveillance and attempts to silence nonviolent anti-AI movements will inevitably backfire, Lubrano says, further pushing people to the violent fringes if they feel their legitimate grievances aren't being addressed."We have this opportunity to be proactive in this while avoiding mistakes that we've made in the past when responding to other forms of extremism," Lubrano said. "Something tells me that we're not off to a great start".

The Final Curtain: A Pivotal Moment in Music HistoryThe Beatles' last official concert on August 29, 1966, at Candlestick Park in San Francisco marked more than just the end of a touring era—it symbolized a fundamental shift in how music would be created and experienced. As Jim Marshall's photographs capture, the band was already feeling nostalgic for what they were leaving behind, even as they stood on the precipice of their most innovative period.The Creative Divide: Studio Innovation vs. Live PerformanceTwo months before their final show, the Beatles had completed recording "Revolver," an album that would push the boundaries of popular music. Yet during their final tour, they performed none of these groundbreaking tracks. The complexity of songs like "Eleanor Rigby" and "Tomorrow Never Knows" simply couldn't be replicated in a live setting with their four-piece band configuration.This creative divide reveals a crucial moment in music history. Until the Beatles, recordings were essentially documentation of live performances. Their first album, "Please Please Me," captured songs honed on stages in Hamburg and Liverpool. By 1966, however, the Beatles had come to see the studio as a creative platform in its own right—a place where experimentation with sounds and techniques could create something entirely new.The Changing Landscape of Live MusicWhile the Beatles were pioneering studio techniques, other artists were revolutionizing the live concert experience. Bob Dylan and the Rolling Stones were developing what we now recognize as the modern rock gig—longer performances, more artistic expression, and a direct connection with audiences that extended beyond simple entertainment.The Beatles' live shows, by contrast, remained stuck in the past. Their 1966 concert format resembled a package-tour variety show, with five or six acts and the Beatles appearing last for a breathless half-hour set before saying goodnight. This disconnect between their recorded work and live performances became increasingly unsustainable as their studio work grew more ambitious.The Legacy of the Final TourThe Beatles' decision to stop touring wasn't merely a practical response to the challenges of performing complex music live—it reflected a deeper artistic evolution. By focusing on studio innovation, they paved the way for future artists who would similarly embrace recording technology as an integral part of the creative process.Ironically, this decision that seemed to separate them from their audience would ultimately transform how musicians connected with fans. The studio innovations pioneered by the Beatles during this period would influence generations of artists, creating new possibilities for musical expression that continue to resonate today.The End of an Era and the Birth of a New Musical LanguageThe Beatles' final tour marked not just the end of an era for the band, but a turning point for popular music as a whole. As they transitioned from live performers to studio innovators, they helped create a new musical language that would define the decades to come.The photographs from this period, capturing the band at this transitional moment, serve as a visual document of one of music history's most significant transformations. They show a group on the cusp of their most creative period, already looking back with nostalgia at the live performances that had made them global superstars, while simultaneously embracing the future possibilities that studio recording would unlock.