Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced plans to address addictive features in social media platforms, signaling a potential regulatory shift following a significant US court ruling that held Meta and YouTube accountable for harms caused by their technology designs.The prime minister emphasized that the recent California court verdict reflects rising public expectations for more aggressive regulation of social media platforms. "I'm absolutely clear that we need to go further," Starmer stated, adding that "the status quo isn't good enough" in terms of protecting children online.Starmer specifically mentioned that the government is consulting about banning social media for under-16s and expressed strong commitment to addressing addictive features within social media platforms. These remarks come amid growing international pressure on tech companies to address the potential harms of their products on young users.In the landmark US case, a California jury found Meta and YouTube negligent for failing to provide adequate warnings about the potential dangers of their platforms. The plaintiff, a 20-year-old woman who claimed she became addicted to social media during her childhood, was awarded $6 million (£4.5 million) in damages, with Meta responsible for 70% of the payment and YouTube covering the remainder.The Duke and Duchess of Sussex welcomed the verdict as "a reckoning" for tech companies, stating in a joint statement: "For too long, families have paid the price for platforms built with total disregard for the children they reach." They emphasized that "today, the truth has been heard and precedent has been set" regarding children's safety versus corporate profits.Both Google, which owns YouTube, and Meta have indicated they will challenge the decision. Google claimed the case "misunderstands YouTube, which is a responsibly built streaming platform, not a social media site," while Meta stated it "respectfully disagrees with the verdict and is evaluating our legal options." The verdict came after nine days of deliberation in the first lawsuit concerning social media's alleged harm to young people to reach trial.The ruling has resonated beyond the courtroom, with European Commission digital chief Henna Virkkunen noting that such cases send "a very clear message" to online platforms about the risks they pose. Campaigners for safer social media have celebrated the decision as a potential watershed moment in regulating platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and X.The Molly Rose Foundation, established after the death of 14-year-old Molly Russell who was exposed to harmful content on Instagram, called for legislation that would make "safety and wellbeing the price for tech firms to pay for doing business in the UK." Thomas Lancaster, a computing expert at Imperial College London, emphasized that policies must be effectively enforced to protect those they're designed to safeguard.Sacha Haworth, executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, declared that "the era of big tech invincibility is over," suggesting that the verdict validates concerns about tech platforms' impact on young people that have been raised for years.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has accused Crispin Odey, a former hedge fund manager, of attempting to manipulate a victim of sexual assault into silence. According to evidence presented in court, Odey sent a text to his former employee in January 2022, warning her that the FCA could question her about him.Odey, who has previously accepted that he groped the woman without her consent in 2005, claimed he was under the influence of sedatives at the time. He now faces a number of sexual harassment allegations and has launched a £79m libel lawsuit against the Financial Times.The FCA's lawyer, Clare Sibson, argued that Odey was trying to manipulate the victim into silence and had a clear motive to discourage her from providing her account to the FCA. Odey, however, claimed he only wanted to ensure the woman would "tell the truth".The hearing continues, with Odey hoping to overturn the FCA's decision to ban him from the UK's financial services industry. In addition to the libel lawsuit, Odey is also facing civil personal injury claims by five women, including one who accused him of rape.

Robyn, the self-proclaimed Fembot, has always been known for pushing boundaries with her music. Her latest album, Sexistential, is no exception. The Swedish pop star's ninth album is a collection of songs that explore a new philosophy on love, relationships, and emotions.The album's lead single, Dopamine, sets the tone for the rest of the record. With its glittering, arpeggiated synths and introspective lyrics, the song finds Robyn questioning the nature of love and emotions. “I know it’s just dopamine, but it feels so real to me / I’m tripping on our chemistry,” she muses.Sexistential is a departure from Robyn's previous work, with a focus on electronic sounds and lyrics that challenge traditional notions of romance. The album's title track is a case study in Robyn's new mentality, with Robyn rapping about hooking up while undergoing IVF as a solo parent. The song's counterpart, Blow My Mind, is a revamp of her 2002 single, made psychedelic and faster, with lyrics that focus on loving her young son.The album's themes of love, relationships, and emotions are explored through a variety of songs, each with its own unique sound and style. From the thumping, claustrophobic drum machine of Really Real to the retro vocoder and Ministry of Sound piano of Talk to Me, each song showcases Robyn's ability to craft catchy, thought-provoking pop music.The album's finale, Into the Sun, is a surging electro-ballad with tangled religious imagery that makes it tricky to parse. However, the album's defining moment falls on Dopamine, where Robyn finds a way to hold two truths at the same time: feelings are chemical, and some feelings feel amazing. “When I let go, it’s so easy,” she spins, giddy, before hitting a high note that comes straight from the gut.

The estate of late British tech tycoon Mike Lynch has been ordered to pay £920m to the technology company Hewlett-Packard (HP) two years after he died in a superyacht disaster.The ruling by London’s high court said the estate was liable to pay the sum as compensation, costs, and interest for HP’s acquisition of Lynch’s firm Autonomy, after a UK legal ruling in 2022 that he duped the US firm into paying £8.2bn for his software firm Autonomy.The deceased entrepreneur’s estate has been estimated to be worth about £500m, so the damages could leave it bankrupt.Lynch and six others, including his 18-year-old daughter Hannah, died in August 2024 on a trip with friends and family celebrating his acquittal on US fraud charges relating to HP’s $11bn takeover of Autonomy in 2011.HP accused Lynch and Autonomy’s former chief financial officer, Sushovan Hussain, of inflating the firm’s value before the takeover. HP wrote down Autonomy’s worth by $8.8bn (£6.5bn) within a year of the purchase.The US tech company has sought damages in UK civil proceedings of up to $4.55bn from the estate of the late tycoon, who was once hailed as Britain’s answer to Microsoft founder Bill Gates.However, the level of the claim was ruled last year by the high court to be “always exaggerated”, as it concluded that Lynch’s estate owed £700m in compensation. The £920m figure includes costs and interest.Lawyers for Lynch’s estate sought permission to appeal against Tuesday’s ruling, which was refused. However, the estate can apply directly to the court of appeal.HP welcomed Tuesday’s decision, which it said in a statement “brings us another step closer to resolution of the dispute”.A spokesperson for the Lynch family said: “We are disappointed by the court’s refusal and believe an application to the court of appeal should follow in the interests of justice. HP’s $5bn damages claim has already been shown to be vastly exaggerated.“Today’s judgment describes the exaggeration as ‘without foundation’ and the purposes for which it was ‘calibrated, publicised and pursued’ as objectionable, misleading shareholders and extending the litigation unnecessarily.“Dr Lynch’s acquittal in the US, where witnesses were properly cross-examined, exposed the truth. The damage to Autonomy was the result of HP’s own actions and failures, not wrongdoing at Autonomy.”

The film 'Empire of Lies' starts with a promising premise for a low-budget psychological thriller, set entirely in a field in Gloucestershire. The story revolves around Dave, a middle-aged man played by Joseph Millson, who lives in a caravan and keeps a gun in his kitchen cupboard. His life takes a dramatic turn when a young woman, claiming to be a YouTuber, enters his field with a camera.The woman, played by Natalie Spence, uncovers a dark past, revealing that Dave's climate-activist daughter has been murdered, with Dave as the prime suspect. The police lack evidence to charge him, but the media has vilified him. As the story unfolds, it becomes clear that Dave is a far-right conspiracist with extreme views on various topics, including Covid and dinosaurs.The film's tension builds as Dave shares his side of the story with the YouTuber, who initially appears earnest in her pursuit of truth. However, the script and direction struggle to maintain the high-wire act, making the twist ending feel somewhat unsatisfying. Despite solid performances from the actors, the film fails to generate enough genuine emotion or intrigue to keep viewers engaged.'Empire of Lies' is set to release in UK cinemas on March 27 and on digital platforms on April 13.

Global stock markets swung wildly on Monday as investors reacted to US President Donald Trump's decision to postpone military strikes on Iranian power plants. The move led to a relief rally in European markets, with the French Cac 40, Spanish Ibex, and German Dax all rising by 0.8%, 1%, and 1.2% respectively.The FTSE 100 share index, which had fallen by almost 1.5% in early trading, reversed course to gain 0.4% before paring back to close down 0.2%. US markets were up more than 1% in early afternoon trading on Wall Street.Oil prices, which had been rising after Trump threatened to strike Iranian infrastructure, dropped sharply. Brent crude, the international benchmark, fell 10% to $101 a barrel. The UK month-ahead gas prices fell 6% to 142p a therm.Trump announced on his social media platform Truth Social that the US and Iran had “very good and productive conversations” over the past two days regarding “a complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East”. He said he had instructed the Department of War to postpone any and all military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure for a five-day period, subject to the success of ongoing meetings and discussions.The global economy has been bracing for much higher oil prices due to disruption in the strait of Hormuz, with Goldman Sachs forecasting Brent crude will average $85 a barrel this year, up from previous expectations of $77 a barrel. Brent hit $119.50 a barrel earlier this month, the highest since the war began.

Michelle De Swarte's comedy career is a testament to her versatility, having worked as a model, actor, journalist, and now comedian. Her latest touring show, 'The Afters', is a hilarious and mouthy performance that leaves audiences in stitches. While the set may not break new ground in terms of comedy themes, De Swarte's confident and cavalier standup voice makes it a standout.From the outset, De Swarte's ability to turn crowd work into a fine set piece about cultural appropriation and Norfolk seafarers showcases her skill. She follows up with a number about a “poor-off” contest she had with a citizen of Bradford, whose salty tang of truth adds up to something far funnier than the usual comedy of class cliches. Her menopause material is distinguished by her pose of stroppy denial, making it a refreshing take on a commonly tackled topic.De Swarte's say-what-she-sees manner seems wholly unaffected, as she arches eyebrows at various aspects of modernity. Her resistance to touchy-feeliness is evident, and her background – poor, queer, and ruthlessly unsentimental – provides context for her personality and comedic style. The show's later stages feature rough-hewn comic effect as De Swarte recalls her forebears and their attitudes.The show's final section, in which De Swarte recalls her encounters with Jeffrey Epstein and P Diddy, leaves the audience wanting more. Perhaps there's a whole show or book to come from this cheerfully incautious comic voice. For now, 'The Afters' is a must-see for fans of comedy and those looking for a fresh voice in the industry.

Huw Edwards, the former BBC presenter, has publicly criticized Channel 5 for producing a drama about his downfall without first verifying the facts with him. The two-part show, titled Power: The Downfall of Huw Edwards and starring Martin Clunes, aired on Channel 5.Edwards was suspended from his role as a leading news anchor in 2023 after allegations surfaced that he had paid a teenager £35,000 for intimate images and conversations. He has since disputed the principal allegations made in the Sun.In a statement, Edwards expressed his disapproval of the production company Wonderhood, stating that they made no attempt to check the truth of their narrative before producing the drama. He also criticized Channel 5 for not allowing him to respond to the allegations before the show aired.Edwards added that he plans to produce his own account of the events and expressed deep regret and remorse for his crimes, having received a six-month sentence suspended for two years for possessing indecent images of children.A Channel 5 spokesperson defended the drama, stating that it was based on extensive interviews with the victim, his family, and court reporting, and that all allegations were put to Edwards via his solicitors before transmission.