Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

The Lead Kane Parsons' feature directing debut, Backrooms, is a horror film that has been making waves in the industry with its unique blend of psychological terror and conceptual storytelling. Based on Parsons' web series and scripted by Will Soodik, the film stars Chiwetel Ejiofor and Renate Reinsve. The Event Details The film revolves around Clark (Chiwetel Ejiofor), a failed architect and alcoholic who manages a vast discount furniture store called Cap'n Clark's Ottoman Empire. Clark's life takes a dark turn when he discovers a supernaturally porous section of wall in the store's basement, leading him to a vast network of 'backrooms' - strange, installation-style areas that show snapshots of different versions of reality. The Data Analysis The film features a blend of genuine constructions and digital fabrication in its production design by Danny Vermette. The cinematography by Jeremy Cox creates an oppressive, crepuscular kind of dead yellowish light, adding to the film's eerie atmosphere. The Impact Analysis Backrooms draws inspiration from various sources, including J-horror, the V/H/S found footage franchise, Dan Erickson's Severance, and Nathan Fielder's The Rehearsal. The film's unique approach to horror has been praised for its originality and ability to progressively raise the stakes towards a thrilling conclusion. The Prediction With its release scheduled for May 28 in Australia and May 29 in the UK and US, Backrooms is expected to make a significant impact on the horror film genre. Fans of psychological terror and conceptual storytelling are eagerly anticipating the film's release, which promises to deliver a fascinating exploration of memories, past traumas, and alternate realities.

The Comedian Who Refuses to Stay SilentNish Kumar has built a career on being unafraid to speak his mind, even when it means confronting fellow comedians like Jimmy Carr about their decisions to perform in controversial venues. The British stand-up, known for his articulate and politically charged humor, recently discussed his confrontations with comics who participated in the Riyadh comedy festival, calling it part of the "cultural-washing of a repressive regime." Kumar's upcoming tour, "Angry Humour from a Really Nice Guy," reflects his concern that comedy has been "co-opted by charlatans in service of autocrats." Despite his willingness to court controversy, Kumar admits there are moments when he questions his approach, joking that "you should not be allowed to give interviews" when discussing fellow comedians.The Confrontation Over Comedy EthicsKumar's most notable public clash came when he confronted Jimmy Carr about his decision to appear on Jordan Peterson's podcast, which Kumar described as "a radicalisation event that's happening on an unprecedented scale." His criticism extends to other comics who performed in Saudi Arabia, including Bill Burr, Dave Chappelle, and Jack Whitehall. Kumar alleges that some comics "signed a contract agreeing to not have a go at MBS [Mohammed bin Salman, the crown prince of Saudi Arabia]" and expressed particular frustration with those who have complained about cancel culture while participating in such events. "I don't want to hear about free speech from any of these cunts again," he stated emphatically. These confrontations highlight Kumar's commitment to what he sees as ethical boundaries in comedy, even when it means alienating his peers.A Career Forged in Debate and DeterminationNow 40, Kumar has been performing stand-up for two decades, though his love for comedy began much earlier. At age five, he was studying The VHS of The Simpsons, analyzing its intricate references and in-jokes. His influences included Chris Rock and the sketch show Goodness Gracious Me, which helped him see comedy as a viable path for someone of his background. "Until then, the only people I'd seen do comedy were either white or African American. You see a bunch of Indians doing it, you think: Oh, this is viable for me." Kumar's early career involved temping while struggling to make inroads in comedy, buoyed only by "the persistent encouragement of my friends." His big break came in 2015 when his fourth fringe show was nominated for an Edinburgh comedy award, followed by regular TV appearances and eventually becoming a household name after joining The Mash Report in 2017.The Impact of a Progressive Voice in ComedyKumar's outspoken progressive politics made him both celebrated and controversial. His appearances on Question Time prompted social media abuse, and figures like Piers Morgan and Andrew Neil criticized him for an "anti-British" episode of Horrible Histories. Despite these controversies, Kumar believes his involvement in culture wars ultimately did more harm than good. "It's a fucking relief. It didn't do anybody any good; me being in the conversation didn't benefit any of the causes that I was passionate about. I worry sometimes that it actually actively hindered them." Despite this, his influence has grown internationally, with The New York Times suggesting he might be "the angry progressive standup the US badly needs." His cross-generational appeal has also expanded, with audiences ranging from 14-year-olds to septuagenarians, reflecting his ability to connect with diverse audiences through his blend of political commentary and personal vulnerability.Anger and Authenticity in a New Era of ComedyAs he approaches his 40s, Kumar continues to refine his approach to comedy that balances anger with authenticity. He has been open about his mental health struggles, including diagnoses of PTSD and ADHD, which inform his work. His upcoming tour "Angry Humour from a Really Nice Guy" suggests a continued commitment to comedy that challenges both audiences and the industry itself. Despite his success in the US, where he performed his new show and appeared on Have I Got News for You, Kumar's material remains rooted in UK concerns, with American audiences showing enough interest in British politics to appreciate his takes on figures like Angela Rayner. As he continues to navigate the complexities of comedy that both entertains and provokes, Kumar remains committed to what he sees as the essential role of comedy in holding power accountable, even when it means making enemies in the process.

Bipartisan Push to Strip Section 224 from the 2026 NDAADemocratic Ro Khanna and Republican Thomas Massie have announced a joint amendment to delete Section 224, a clause that would create an “executive agent” to synchronize U.S. and Israeli defense‑technology programs. Their collaboration marks an unusual alliance between a progressive and a libertarian as they confront a provision many see as a backdoor to deeper military integration.What Section 224 Would Have MandatedThe provision requires the Secretary of Defense to designate an executive agent responsible for “synchronising cooperative efforts” between the United States and Israel, covering research, development, testing, evaluation, integration and industrial cooperation on defence technology.Creates a permanent liaison office within the Pentagon.Oversees joint AI‑driven surveillance, anti‑drone and anti‑tunnel projects.Blurs the line between foreign aid and joint R&D, potentially masking the cost of U.S. support.Financial Scale and Public SentimentThe 2026 National Defense Authorization Act totals roughly $1.15 trillion. While the bill contains a broader “Matters relating to Israel” section, Section 224 is singled out for its technology‑focused language.Recent polling by The New York Times and Siena College shows 57 % of U.S. voters oppose additional economic and military aid to Israel, and 62 % disapprove of the Israeli‑Palestinian conflict overall. The war in Gaza has already claimed more than 75,000 lives, fueling a historic low in American support for Israel.Political Ramifications for US‑Israel Defense TiesThe bipartisan effort underscores a growing willingness to question the “unconditional” nature of U.S. support. While some Republicans, such as Derrick Van Orden, label criticism of the measure as anti‑Semitic, others argue that the technology partnership could entangle U.S. forces in conflicts where Israeli tactics—such as the 2024 pager‑rigging incident—have caused civilian casualties.Khanna’s amendment also revives a broader anti‑war coalition that previously pushed for the release of Jeffrey Epstein files, indicating a strategic use of defense‑budget oversight to advance transparency and limit overseas entanglements.Outlook: What Happens Next in the Legislative ProcessIf the House Armed Services Committee adopts the amendment, the provision will face a floor vote where party leadership is expected to defend the broader Israel‑friendly provisions of the NDAA. However, the public backlash and the rare bipartisan front could force leadership to negotiate a compromise, possibly reshaping how future defence aid is structured—shifting from direct aid to more transparent, project‑based collaborations.Stakeholders to watch include the Pentagon’s Office of the Secretary of Defense, Israeli defence ministries, and advocacy groups on both sides of the aid debate. The next key dates are the committee markup scheduled for early June and the full House vote slated for late July.

The Decline of the European Green Wave European Green parties have entered a phase of stagnation and crisis, marking a sharp contrast to the 'green wave' that swept across the continent in 2019. While Green parties secured their best-ever result in the European parliament elections that year—winning 74 seats—they have since been forced out of nearly all governing coalitions. This period is characterized by a 'greenlash,' a growing public backlash against climate policies and green projects, leading to election results that have failed to meet expectations. The UK Green Party's Resurgence under Zack Polanski In stark contrast to the continental downturn, the Green Party of England and Wales has experienced a meteoric rise under its new leader, Zack Polanski. Since winning the leadership election in September 2025, the party has shifted its messaging strategy significantly. Polanski has moved away from environmental protection as the sole dominant theme, instead focusing on economic inequality, the cost of living, housing, and rent prices. The party has also adopted a clear stance on social issues, including condemnation of the genocide in Gaza and support for trans rights, positioning itself firmly against the Labour party on these fronts. Economic Inequality as a Driver of Support Data analysis of the UK elections reveals a critical shift in voter demographics. The party's strategy of emphasizing redistribution and social justice has proven highly effective. A report by Persuasion UK indicated that Green voters were equally likely to cite redistribution and taxes as their primary motivators as they were climate breakdown. Notably, the Greens have found a strong foothold among financially insecure voters. Among this demographic with liberal social attitudes, 47% voted for the Greens, compared to only 25% for Labour. This contrasts with many European Green parties, which traditionally rely on support from highly educated, financially secure voters. Beyond Left vs. Right: The Three Pillars of Success The UK model offers three distinct lessons for European parties seeking to reverse their fortunes: Emphasize Economic Inequality: Broadening the agenda to include redistributive policies does not damage credibility on climate issues; rather, it expands the electoral coalition. Hold Strong Positions on Social Issues: Taking a clear, unwavering stance on progressive identity politics (such as trans rights) creates space to discuss economic agendas without getting bogged down in culture wars. Embrace Progressive Identity Politics: The party has successfully become a home for activists and voters disillusioned with traditional party structures, engaging with nightlife and cultural spaces to build a grassroots movement. The Future Outlook: A Dominant Left-Wing Coalition? The perceived 'greenlash' has caused many European Green parties to become hesitant and moderate, watering down their demands. However, the UK experience suggests a different path: be bolder and clearer in messaging. Given the current weakness of many social democratic parties across Europe, there is a unique opportunity for Green parties to broaden their appeal. By adopting this strategy of economic focus and progressive identity, Green parties could potentially evolve from niche movements into the dominant left-of-centre force in European politics.

Visual Chronicle of Arne Slot’s Liverpool JourneyThe Guardian assembled a curated collection of photographs that map the arc of Arne Slot’s Liverpool career, from his inaugural press conference to his final matchday. Each image serves as a visual timestamp, capturing the atmosphere in the dressing room, the intensity on the pitch, and the reactions of supporters.Key Milestones Captured in the GalleryFirst win that broke the early‑season slump, sparking a brief resurgence.Signature tactical shift to a high‑pressing 4‑3‑3 that produced a string of clean‑sheet victories.Notable defeat against a traditional rival that reignited criticism of the side’s defensive organization.Season‑ending cup final appearance, marking the deepest run in a major tournament under Slot.Financial and Competitive Implications of Slot’s TenureTransfer window activity saw a net spend of approximately £85 million, reflecting Slot’s emphasis on youthful acquisitions.Merchandise sales surged by 12 % following the early‑season winning streak, before stabilising.League position fluctuated between 3rd and 7th, influencing prize‑money distribution and broadcasting revenue.Repercussions for Liverpool’s Strategic DirectionSlot’s blend of attacking flair and occasional defensive frailties prompted the club’s hierarchy to reassess long‑term recruitment and coaching philosophies. The visual narrative underscores a shift toward a more progressive playing style, while also highlighting the need for greater squad depth to sustain challenges on multiple fronts.Outlook for Liverpool Post‑Slot EraWith Slot’s departure now a focal point, Liverpool faces a crossroads: whether to double‑down on the tactical framework he introduced or revert to a more conservative approach. The images suggest a fan base that remains divided but hopeful, setting the stage for a pivotal appointment that could define the club’s trajectory for the next decade.

The Lead: This Week's Entertainment HighlightsThis week's entertainment landscape offers a diverse array of critically acclaimed shows and films, from hilarious comedies to chilling horror. Channel 4's "Make That Movie" stands out as one of the funniest shows of the year, while Netflix's "The Four Seasons" returns with a brilliant second season. Horror fans can explore the disturbing world of "Backrooms," while Marvel offers a stylish take with "Spider-Noir."TV Comedy Gold: Make That MovieChannel 4Summed up in a sentence Last One Laughing finalist delivers one of the funniest shows of the year, with this mockumentary about a director who makes awful films.What our reviewer said "So ostentatiously silly that it deserves to be paraded around the streets." Stuart HeritageRead the full reviewFurther reading "People are like: you're a crackpot": how Sam Campbell became comedy's oddball superstarNetflix Triumph: The Four Seasons ReturnsNetflixSummed up in a sentence Tina Fey triumphs again with the return of this comedy about a group of middle-aged friends who reunite during holidays throughout the year.What our reviewer said "Even more perspicacious, poignant and hilarious than the first." Chitra RamaswamyRead the full reviewMarvel's Stylish Take: Spider-NoirPrime VideoSummed up in a sentence In Marvel's witty homage to the hard-boiled films and fictions of the 40s – which can be watched in colour or black-and-white – Nicolas Cage plays Ben Reilly, who gave up being superhero "the Spider" five years ago.What our reviewer said "Everything is shot with style and confidence." Lucy ManganRead the full reviewFurther reading The life of PIs: the strange case of 2026's resurgence of hard-boiled detectivesHidden Gem: PoniesNow/Sky AtlanticSummed up in a sentence Emilia Clarke and Haley Lu Richardson have heaps of fun as two widows who become cold war spies in this espionage comedy-drama.What our reviewer said "It's a mashup of genres and tropes, but it is its own thing too – and an unexpected treat at that." Lucy ManganRead the full reviewHorror Innovation: BackroomsIn cinemas nowSummed up in a sentence A debut from 20-year-old director Kane Parsons that examines memory, reality and fear in an icily disturbing horror, in which Chiwetel Ejiofor accesses an infinite series of hidden rooms that all feel creepily askew.What our reviewer said "Backrooms progressively raises its game towards the big finish with jump scares, squirm scares and tiny shiver scares. There is real fascination in exploring this vast, invisible city state of fear." Peter BradshawRead the full reviewFurther reading Are you sitting uncomfortably? How Backrooms upended the horror movieMusic and Bromance: Power BalladIn cinemas nowSummed up in a sentence Nick Jonas and Paul Rudd star in a comedy of bromance and betrayal from Irish writer-director John Carney that brilliantly brings together Rudd's washed-up wedding singer and Jonas's insecure ex-boyband superstar.What our reviewer said "Power Ballad is about making it and dreaming big, about every busker never giving up on hopes of one day being mega. But as so often with Carney, it's about something else, usually left unacknowledged in movies about music or any sort of show business: the terrible binary of success and failure." Peter BradshawRead the full reviewUnexpected Pairing: TunerIn cinemas nowSummed up in a sentence Playing a piano tuner with super-sensitive hearing, Leo Woodall's relationship with Dustin Hoffman is a tender highlight in this safe-cracking thriller.What our reviewer said "What a pair they are; they are a real pleasure to watch in an easy, unforced drama that mixes romcom moments with a relaxed crime thriller. It's like the Safdie brothers in chill-out mode." Cath Clarke

The Isolation of Cuba For many Europeans, Cuba was once a progressive cause, a plucky little country that had overthrown a corrupt regime and defended its independence against a US economic embargo. However, today Cubans are languishing in desperate poverty with little or no electricity, enduring a US blockade of fuel supplies ordered by Donald Trump. The US Blockade and Its Impact The US decision to indict Raúl Castro, Fidel's 94-year-old brother and successor, for murder shows how determined Washington is to eliminate the old guard. Factories and transportation are at a standstill for lack of power, and hospitals struggle to treat patients with scant fuel to keep emergency generators working. The Lack of Support from Europe Yet few beyond the hard-left fringes of European politics are protesting against the manifestly illegal strangulation of the Cuban economy and people. The world won't lift a finger to shield Cuba from Trump's deadly squeeze or to prevent regime change. Even indignation is in short supply. The Reasons Behind Europe's Abandonment This is partly because Cuba's traditional friends and allies – Russia, Venezuela, Mexico and Brazil – are either disabled, distracted or have bigger fish to fry with Washington. It is also because Cubans' plight is overwhelmingly due to their country's feckless rulers, who have done little to help their own people. The Future Outlook Whether Washington imposes a “deal” on Cuba's current leaders or tightens its noose in a bid to overthrow them, don’t expect Europe to do anything to stop the next episode in the “Donroe doctrine”. Europeans, too, have bigger fish to fry with Trump. They may have history with Cuba, but the US has geography and geopolitics on its side.

The Crossroads of Colombian PoliticsColombia stands at a critical juncture as its electorate prepares to cast ballots in a high-stakes election that promises to define the nation's political trajectory for the coming years. The campaign has crystallized into a stark dichotomy, with voters presented with two fundamentally different blueprints for the country's governance, economy, and social fabric.Defining the Divergent VisionsThe political landscape has narrowed down to a decisive contest between two opposing ideologies. One camp advocates for a transformative approach to social equity and state intervention, while the other champions market-oriented reforms and fiscal conservatism. This is not merely a contest of personalities but a referendum on the direction of the Colombian state.The Stakes of a Binary ChoiceThe polarization reflects deeper societal fractures regarding economic reform, security policies, and the role of the state in addressing inequality. Voters are weighing the risks of radical change against the stability of the status quo, making this one of the most consequential decisions in recent Colombian history.Forecasting the Post-Election LandscapeThe outcome will likely set the tone for regional diplomatic relations and domestic stability, determining whether Colombia moves toward a more progressive or conservative agenda. The result will serve as a bellwether for the broader Latin American political climate.

The Lead: Labour's Internal Debate Over InequalitySenior Labour figures Wes Streeting and Andy Burnham have launched a sharp critique of former Prime Minister Tony Blair, accusing him of failing to confront inequality in his recent assessment of the party. The exchange comes as Blair published a lengthy critique of Labour's time in office under Keir Starmer, advocating for policies including cracking down on welfare spending and abandoning restrictions on oil and gas production.The Event Details: Blair's Critique and Labour's ResponseIn his essay, Blair criticized the policy proposals of both Burnham and Streeting – both widely expected to challenge Starmer for the leadership should Burnham win the Makerfield byelection. Streeting responded in a Guardian article, stating that "inequality – the economic, social and democratic fracture running through modern Britain – is treated as peripheral rather than fundamental" in Blair's analysis.Burnham, the mayor of Greater Manchester, added that "He doesn't mention inequality once" in Blair's essay, suggesting that failing to address this issue demonstrates a misunderstanding of current political dynamics. "If you don't get how that's driving politics now, if you are not rooting your analysis in the fact that people are unable to live and that things that were taken for granted are no longer affordable, then you are not understanding what's going on," Burnham stated.The Ideological Divide: Policy Disagreements Within LabourThe disagreement highlights significant policy differences within the Labour party. Streeting defended his approach to taxation, stating it was vital to "tip the balance of taxation away from work towards wealth," directly countering Blair's suggestions. He also rejected Blair's call for accommodation with US policies, criticizing Blair's war in Iraq and stating that "Atlanticism cannot mean automatic subservience."Torsten Bell, the Department for Work and Pensions minister who was a key author of Labour's last budget, supported the criticism of Blair's analysis, stating that "the challenge for the essay is that it doesn't have a project that remotely fits the time and place we are living in." Bell also disputed Blair's assessment that VAT should have been raised instead of employers' national insurance, calling it "a recipe for much higher interest rates" and inflation.The Political Implications: Leadership Challenges and Party DirectionThe exchange comes at a critical time for the Labour party, with potential leadership challenges on the horizon. Blair's critique specifically targeted the policy proposals of both Burnham and Streeting, who are seen as potential successors to Starmer. The focus on inequality suggests a strategic positioning by these figures as they prepare for potential leadership contests.Streeting emphasized that "the task of progressive politics is not to recreate yesterday, but to ensure ordinary working people have power, protection and opportunity in the world now emerging." This approach contrasts with what appears to be Blair's nostalgia for past political strategies, particularly the 1990s approach that defined his premiership.The Future Outlook: Labour's Path ForwardBlair has stated that his essay aims to "start a debate in the party about serious policy," suggesting that he views the current direction as potentially leading to "real trouble" for the country. However, the response from senior Labour figures indicates that any debate will necessarily center on the role of inequality in British politics and the appropriate response to economic challenges.The exchange also highlights the ongoing tension within Labour between different generations of leadership and their approaches to policy. As the party considers its future direction, the debate over inequality appears set to remain central, with Streeting and Burnham positioning themselves as champions of addressing economic disparities that they see as fundamental to modern British politics.