Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

The Visit's Mixed Outcomes United States President Donald Trump has departed China following a three-day trip, touting several broad trade deals but suggesting little progress on key issues related to Taiwan or the US-Israeli war in Iran. Progress on Taiwan Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump said he and Xi discussed Taiwan, with China’s leader telling him he opposed independence for the self-governing island Beijing claims as its own. Trump said he had not made a decision on US arms sales to Taiwan, an issue with deep support within the US Congress that Beijing vehemently opposes. The US does not have official ties with Taiwan, but has for years provided billions of dollars in military aid. The Iran Conflict On Iran, Trump said he and Xi spoke at length about the US-Israeli war, and their shared desire for the Strait of Hormuz to be reopened. Some Trump administration officials have called on Beijing to use its leverage over Tehran to help break an ongoing deadlock in ceasefire negotiations. Trump downplayed the issue during the trip, saying he was not “asking for any favours” on Iran. Trade Deals Touted Trump concluded his visit touting a series of “fantastic trade deals for both countries”. Trump said China agreed to buy 200 jets from US aviation manufacturer Boeing, the first purchase of US deals in more than a decade. The White House also said China could soon begin buying more US oil and farm goods.

Marc Guéhi's FA Cup Journey Marc Guéhi’s whirlwind 12 months in the FA Cup: captaining Crystal Palace to glory at Wembley last season, experiencing the competition’s greatest shock via the holders’ third-round elimination at sixth-tier Macclesfield and, on Saturday, aiming to claim the trophy again when Manchester City face Chelsea. The Defender's Story Guéhi’s character, alongside his stellar talent, has driven his rise, after rejection at Chelsea. After progressing through the west London club’s ranks, Guéhi made two League Cup starts in the autumn of 2019 – against Grimsby and Manchester United – before being loaned to Swansea in January 2020 and the following season. An £18m transfer to Palace followed in July 2021. The Impact of Guéhi's Journey Guéhi is asked whether the Cup final is a chance to show Chelsea they were wrong about him. He says: “That’s not my mentality. I completely understand people that have that thought process but I’ve got nothing but gratitude towards Chelsea. Going there from such a young age, I am super grateful to the coaches, and the players I played with. And, to have been given the opportunity to play for the club, a couple of times.” The Future Outlook Guardiola may depart in the summer and the captain, Bernardo Silva, and John Stones are leaving. Guéhi, in his modest way, is reluctant to say whether he will become one of the leaders.

The Visual Diplomacy of Tiananmen SquareDuring the welcome ceremony in Tiananmen Square, the optics of the meeting were meticulously curated to convey a sense of unity and shared status. Donald Trump and Xi Jinping mirrored one another in strikingly similar attire: both wore blue, single-breasted suits with flap pockets, two buttons with only the top one fastened, and red ties. This visual symmetry was not accidental; it was surrounded by a delegation of other officials, creating a tableau of synchronized power.The delegation included Stephen Miller and Pete Hegseth, who wore pocket squares and flamboyant ties, while Elon Musk opted for a green tie. This diversity in the supporting cast made the symmetry between the two leaders more visually striking, reinforcing the message of a cohesive front.The Psychology of the 'Chameleon Effect'The strategic choice of matching suits is rooted in the psychological concept of the 'chameleon effect,' where subtle mimicry increases rapport and cooperation. Enda Young, founder and CEO of the Centre for Negotiation and Leadership, explains that people tend to warm more quickly to those who seem similar to them, whether through behavior, language, or appearance. In high-stakes negotiations, this non-verbal signaling can signal alignment and mutual respect before a single word is spoken.This strategy aligns with Robert Cialdini's principle of 'liking,' which posits that similarity tends to increase trust and openness to influence. By dressing alike, the leaders were attempting to bypass initial defenses and establish a subconscious bond that could facilitate smoother trade deals and geopolitical gains.Historical Precedents of Political TwinningThis is not the first time political leaders have utilized matching outfits to signal a thaw in relations. The article highlights several historical examples of this diplomatic tactic:Lula and Macron (2024): The Brazilian and French leaders wore matching white shirts during their Amazon rainforest meeting, which was widely interpreted as a sign of a developing 'bromance' and shared ecological goals.Zelenskyy and Trump (2025): The Ukrainian president was initially admonished for wearing a military sweatshirt rather than a suit during a disastrous Oval Office meeting. His subsequent return in a military-style 'suit' was viewed as a diplomatic concession to align with the host's expectations.Liz Truss (2022): The former UK Prime Minister faced criticism for wearing a dress that appeared identical to a fictional dictator, illustrating how poor synchronization can undermine authority.Strategic Implications for Future SummitsThe use of matching attire in the Beijing summit suggests a shift towards more performative diplomacy. As leaders seek to secure complex trade agreements and navigate geopolitical tensions, the visual language of power is becoming as critical as the policy language. Future summits will likely continue to utilize this 'twinning' strategy to signal cooperation, with the success of the meeting potentially hinging on how effectively these non-verbal cues translate into tangible policy outcomes.

The Historical Reckoning: US and the Nakba Washington, DC – It is a question that reaches a fever pitch this time of year for Palestinian survivors and rights advocates: Can the United States government create just policy in the Middle East without a full accounting — or recognition — of Palestinian history? Thursday marks the annual day of remembrance for the Nakba, a period that began in 1948 with the mass expulsion of Palestinians and the creation of the state of Israel. Since then, Palestinians have endured decades of displacement and ethnic cleansing. But the US government does not recognise the Nakba, which translates to the "catastrophe" in Arabic, even as it continues to assert gargantuan influence over the region and maintains ironclad support for the Israeli government. The Nakba: A Historical Overview Under the second administration of President Donald Trump, the US has taken a further active role in Palestinian affairs, establishing the controversial "Board of Peace" to oversee the reconstruction of Gaza, even as it continues to take a permissive approach towards Israel's actions in the region. When faced with the question of whether the US can responsibly address Palestinian issues without acknowledging the Nakba, Khaled Elgindy, a senior fellow at the Quincy Institute, believes the answer is simple: No. "If you only acknowledge the humanity and suffering of one side, that forces you also to ignore historical realities that are still with us today," he told Al Jazeera. Elgindy said "political amnesia" has long defined the US government's approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict. The Human Cost: Numbers and Impact For decades, the US has supported Israel with billions in foreign assistance and military aid, despite the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory and a system of segregation that rights groups say constitutes apartheid. Since October 7, 2023, Israel's war in Gaza has killed at least 75,000 Palestinians. Elgindy told Al Jazeera that the US has played a key role in underwriting the conflict. "For better or worse, mostly for worse, the United States is inextricably tied to the Palestinian issue," Elgindy said. A fundamental – if long delayed – corrective step would be recognition of the Nakba, he said. "It is a historical reality that Palestinians have a collective trauma that is part of their identity and part of their political psychology." The Legislative Push: Tlaib's Resolution On Thursday, US Representative Rashida Tlaib introduced a resolution to officially recognise "the ongoing Nakba and Palestinian refugees' rights". It was the fifth consecutive time she has put forward the bill, with the latest version carrying 12 co-sponsors, up from six when it was first introduced in 2022. In a video conference this week, she explained that it was necessary to draw attention to the Nakba, given that the human rights abuses against Palestinians continue. "Too many of my colleagues in Congress like to act like … the state violence against the Palestinian people began with [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu," Tlaib said. "We know that Palestinian history has been one of the ongoing Nakba and the ethnic cleansing campaign since the creation [of Israel] in 1948." All told, about 750,000 Palestinians were violently expelled during the Nakba, displaced to refugee camps across the West Bank, Gaza and neighbouring Arab countries. About 400 cities and villages were depopulated, with massacres committed in Balad al-Sheikh, Saasaa, Deir Yassin, Saliha and Lydda, among others. Shifting Attitudes in American Politics Like in past years, Tlaib's latest legislative effort is largely symbolic, with little chance of progressing in Congress, which remains predominantly pro-Israel. Still, the latest resolution comes amid signs of shifting public awareness, with polls showing increasing sympathy for Palestinians and a rise in negative views towards Israel's government. Polls have shown tanking support for Israel, particularly among Democrats, amid the war in Gaza. Attitudes in Congress have also shown significant, if more incremental, signs of change. Though support for Israel was once considered sacrosanct, legislation to block arms sales to the country has garnered growing support. In April, 40 Democrats in the 100-member Senate voted to block the sale of military bulldozers to Israel, a tool in the ongoing occupation of the Palestinian territories. While legislation to prevent the sale did not pass, advocates hailed the tally as "historic". Thirty members of Congress also challenged the longstanding US policy of "official ambiguity" towards Israel's alleged nuclear programme, a subject that had been seen as off limits for decades. The Historical Context: From Truman to Today Even acknowledging the Nakba on the May 15 anniversary remains controversial. The United Nations held its first-ever commemoration of the Nakba in 2023, marking the 75th anniversary. The US, the United Kingdom, Germany and 30 other countries had voted against a UN resolution recognising the event, though. The US subsequently did not attend the proceedings, with a spokesperson pointing to "longstanding concerns over anti-Israel bias within the UN system". Elgindy pointed out that, in the 1940s and 50s, President Harry Truman "spoke out about the terrorism and terror inflicted by Jewish militias and underground groups", even as his government was the first to recognise the state of Israel. Truman's administration, for instance, supported UN General Assembly Resolution 194, which established a so-called "right to return" for displaced Palestinian refugees – approximately six million are registered with UNRWA today. But Elgindy explained that, broadly speaking, the US acknowledgement of the Nakba declined in parallel with an increasingly full-bore embrace of Israel, beginning most forcefully under President Lyndon B Johnson in the 1960s. The Future Outlook: Recognition and Beyond Supporters of Tlaib's resolution have argued that its significance is as much practical as symbolic. "If policymakers don't factor in the Nakba and remedying it to the extent that it can be remedied today, they're simply going to be perpetuating an unjust status quo," Ruebner said. "Without understanding the crux of the matter, it's almost like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole." The Arab Center's Munayyer agreed that recognition "sets an example for things that we should be doing, not just in terms of recognising the past but also recognising the moment". "It shouldn't take us 80 years to recognise the Nakba in Palestine, and it shouldn't take us another 80 years to recognise the genocide that's taking place in Gaza," he said.

The Current Standings There are seven players tied for the lead, and another 42 within three shots of them. The day before Moving Day is going to feature a lot of jostling for position. Here's what the top of the leaderboard looked like at the end of the first day: -3: Potgieter, Jaeger, Lee, Hisatsune, Kaymer, Scheffler, Smalley -2: Brown, Theegala, Greyserman, Schauffele, Conners, Reed, Lowry Weather Conditions at Aronimink It shouldn't be too different to the first day. A little bit warmer, but with the wind expected to occasionally pick up again. It's blowing pretty briskly right now. There's not much chance of rain, and the course didn't get a soaking tonight, so it'll be a little bit firmer and the ball should scuttle further. Which, given so many of the fairways at Aronimink tilt towards penal rough, may not necessarily be a good thing. But it's a great day for golf! Michael Block's Remarkable Run Block party. It's happening again. He's happening again. Michael Block, the club pro who lit up the 2023 tournament with three rounds of 70 and a 71 that included an ace with Rory McIlroy in attendance, is doing it again. A round of 70 yesterday, and now a 20-foot putt for birdie at the par-three 5th. He's -1 overall and already beginning to dream of making the cut. It'd be an early birthday present: he's 50 next month. Good luck finding a single punter at Aronimink who won't be cheering him on. Today's Tee Times Starting on the 1st: 1145 Michael Block, Rasmus Højgaard, Dustin Johnson 1156 Mark Geddes, Steven Fisk, David Lipsky 1207 Sungjae Im, Austin Hurt, Casey Jarvis 1218 Andrew Putnam, Michael Kartrude, Matt Wallace 1229 Martin Kaymer, Elvis Smylie, Davis Riley 1240 Jason Dufner, Haotong Li, Jimmy Walker 1251 Nick Taylor, Rasmus Neergaard-Petersen, Jordan Smith 1302 Emiliano Grillo, Patrick Reed, Pierceson Coody 1313 Brian Campbell, Adam Schenk, Christiaan Bezuidenhout 1324 Marco Penge, Sepp Straka, Patrick Rodgers 1335 Aaron Rai, Travis Smyth, Sami Valimaki 1346 Sam Stevens, Jayden Schaper, Garrett Sapp 1357 Timothy Wiseman, Matti Schmid, Austin Smotherman 1715 Aldrich Potgieter, David Puig, Denny McCarthy 1726 William Mouw, Chris Gabriele, Taylor Pendrith 1737 Tom Hoge, Bryce Fisher, Joaquin Niemann 1748 Keith Mitchell, Billy Horschel, Ian Holt 1759 Gary Woodland, Jason Day, Sam Burns 1810 Wyndham Clark, Cameron Smith, Brian Harman 1821 Patrick Cantlay, Min Woo Lee, Sahith Theegala 1832 Si Woo Kim, Derek Berg, Joe Highsmith 1843 Bryson DeChambeau, Ludvig Aberg, Rickie Fowler 1854 Xander Schauffele, Brooks Koepka, Tyrrell Hatton 1905 Rory McIlroy, Jordan Spieth, Jon Rahm 1916 Daniel Hillier, Ryan Vermeer, Max McGreevy 1927 Paul McClure, Mikael Lindberg, Angel Ayora Starting on the 10th: 1150 Andrew Novak, John Parry, Jordan Gumberg 1201 Ben Polland, Kurt Kitayama, Nico Echavarria 1212 Akshay Bhatia, Ricky Castillo, Michael Thorbjornsen 1223 Luke Donald, Jesse Droemer, Stewart Cink 1234 Hideki Matsuyama, J.J. Spaun, Max Homa 1245 Ben Kern, J.T. Poston, Russell Henley 1256 Adam Scott, Corey Conners, Daniel Berger 1307 Viktor Hovland, Collin Morikawa, Shane Lowry 1318 Chris Gotterup, Robert MacIntyre, Tommy Fleetwood 1329 Cameron Young, Keegan Bradley, Justin Thomas 1340 Scottie Scheffler, Matt Fitzpatrick, Justin Rose 1351 Zach Haynes, Alex Smalley, Chandler Blanchet 1402 Bernd Wiesberger, Sudarshan Yellamaraju, Andy Sullivan 1710 Braden Shattuck, Alex Fitzpatrick, Ben Griffin 1721 Francisco Bide, Harry Hall, Ryan Gerard 1732 Johnny Keefer, Rico Hoey, Nicolai Højgaard 1743 Shaun Micheel, Michael Brennan, Garrick Higgo 1754 YE Yang, Jhonattan Vegas, Matt McCarty 1805 Lucas Glover, Tom McKibbin, Stephan Jaeger 1816 Daniel Brown, Adrien Saddier, Harris English 1827 Jacob Bridgeman, Bud Cauley, Alex Noren 1838 Chris Kirk, Max Greyserman, Kristoffer Reitan 1849 Maverick McNealy, Thomas Detry, Padraig Harrington 1900 Ryan Lenahan, Ryan Fox, Kazuki Higa 1911 Jared Jones, Michael Kim, Ryo Hisatsune 1922 Tyler Collet, Kota Kaneko, Brandt Snedeker

Early signs point to the United States and China moving towards a relationship focused on pragmatic areas of common interest following President Donald Trump's trip to China, according to analysts, setting aside the turmoil that marked 2025. Business‑First Agenda Sets the Tone at the Beijing Summit The three‑day summit in Beijing brought together Donald Trump and Xi Jinping alongside a delegation of top American CEOs, including the heads of Apple, Nvidia, BlackRock and Goldman Sachs. The White House readout highlighted "ways to enhance economic cooperation" and "expanding market access for American businesses into China and increasing Chinese investment into our industries". Notably, the statement omitted any reference to China’s rare‑earth export controls, a strategic lever in the tech and defence sectors. Financial Stakes: $14 bn Taiwan Arms Deal and Market Access Promises $14 bn arms deal for Taiwan reportedly in the works, pending Trump’s sign‑off. Potential expansion of market access for U.S. firms in sectors ranging from semiconductors to finance. Chinese interest in purchasing more American oil to reduce reliance on the Strait of Hormuz. Geopolitical Ripple Effects: From Taiwan to the Strait of Hormuz Both leaders sidestepped several flashpoints. While Xi called Taiwan the "most important issue" in the bilateral relationship, neither side mentioned concrete steps on the island or on future arms sales. The summit also touched on the Strait of Hormuz, with both leaders agreeing it must remain open for global energy flows, despite ongoing conflict in the region. What Comes Next: Potential Shifts in Trade, Security and Energy Cooperation Analysts such as William Yang (Crisis Group) and Chucheng Feng (Hutong Research) view the summit as an attempt to lay a "floor" for the relationship, establishing guardrails while leaving item‑by‑item disagreements secondary. The next months will test whether the business‑first rhetoric translates into tangible policy – from the fate of the Taiwan arms package to renewed Chinese investment in U.S. industries and coordinated efforts to keep the Strait of Hormuz open.

The Lead: Summit Concludes Without Iran Breakthrough Donald Trump has claimed that the US and China "feel very similar" about ending the war in Iran but offered no details about a possible breakthrough during the final day of his summit with Xi Jinping in Beijing. The Diplomatic Stance: Shared Goals but No Clear Path "We did discuss Iran," Trump said. "We feel very similar about [how] we want it to end. We don't want them to have a nuclear weapon. We want the straits open." He added: "We want them [Iran] to get it ended because it's a crazy thing there, a little bit crazy. And it's no good, it can't happen." The Strategic Pressure: China's Role in Iran Crisis There is much speculation about how much pressure the US is putting on China, the biggest buyer of Iranian oil, to use its leverage with Iran to encourage the country to reopen the strait of Hormuz. US trade representative Jamieson Greer said in an interview with Bloomberg TV on Friday that the Chinese "don't want to be on the wrong side" on the Iran issue. "It's really important for China to have the strait of Hormuz open," Greer said. The Economic Calculus: China's Energy Security Concerns About half of China's crude oil passes through the waterway, but the bigger threat for the Chinese economy is if the conflict in the Middle East causes a global recession that dents demand for its exports. However, many in Beijing feel that the crisis in Iran is not China's responsibility. The Public Statements: Contradictory Messages US Secretary of State Marco Rubio initially said the US hoped "to convince [China] to play a more active role in getting Iran to walk away from what they're doing now and trying to do now in the Persian Gulf." But later he downplayed the idea that the US was seeking support from Beijing. "We're not asking for China's help. We don't need their help," Rubio said. The Chinese Response: Cautious Diplomacy China's foreign ministry on Friday again called for a ceasefire in Iran and said the strait of Hormuz should be opened "as soon as possible." Zhou Bo, a retired senior army colonel and a senior fellow in the Center for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University, said: "On Iran, China definitely wants to help but I read what Rubio said: he actually seems to shift the burden to the Chinese side. In China, we have a saying: it is like, 'Why should I clean your shit?'" The Official Readouts: Diplomatic Language The White House readout of the more than two hours of talks between Trump and Xi on Thursday said the leaders "agreed that the strait of Hormuz must remain open to support the free flow of energy" and that "President Xi also made clear China's opposition to the militarisation of the strait." The Chinese readout of the meeting just made a brief reference to the "situation in the Middle East." The Controversial Remark: Trump's PR Comment Trump raised eyebrows during a TV interview when he suggested that finding Iran's enriched uranium was primarily for show after Israel demanded it as a goal. "I just feel better if I got it, actually, but it's – I think, it's more for public relations than it is for anything else," the US president told Fox News host Sean Hannity. The Trade Deals: Symbolic Gestures Trump told Fox News that China agreed to buy US oil, soybeans and 200 Boeing planes. But on key issues including Taiwan, there seems to have been little by way of concrete agreement. Trump was heard saying on his way into the tea room at the Zhongnanhai garden that Xi was giving him roses for the Rose Garden, according to a White House pool report. The Strategic Balance: Shifting Power Dynamics Julian Gewirtz, a former director for China on the national security council during the Biden administration, said the new Chinese formulation about US-China relations was about "locking in this current phase of strategic stalemate for the remainder of Trump's term and ideally beyond." Wu Xinbo, a professor of international studies at Fudan University and a Chinese government adviser, said the balance of power between the US and China was "shifting towards greater parity." "In the past, it always seemed as though the United States held the upper hand, constantly exerting pressure on China and taking the offensive. Now, however, it's fair to say that the two countries have reached a new point of equilibrium," Wu said.

The Lead Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, has stated that ships entering the Strait of Hormuz must cooperate with Iranian naval forces. This comes after a ship was seized outside a UAE port and taken towards Iranian waters. Iran's New Shipping Rules Araghchi described Iran as invincible and said: "In our view, the strait of Hormuz is open to all commercial ships, but they must cooperate with our naval forces." He made these comments during a meeting of the Brics group of nations in India. The Data Analysis The Strait of Hormuz previously carried about a quarter of the world's seaborne supply of oil and gas. However, Iran has largely closed the strait since the start of the US-Israeli bombing campaign. Last month, the US imposed a counterblockade of Iranian ports, stranding thousands of ships. The Impact Analysis Araghchi called on Brics nations to condemn what he described as violations of international law by the US and Israel. He also stated that regional instability is a lose-lose situation for all parties, including the aggressors themselves. The Prediction Iran is trying to fend off a large rebuff at the UN, where more than 110 nations are co-sponsoring a security council resolution tabled jointly by Bahrain and the US condemning the Iranian blockade. A previous resolution was vetoed jointly by Russia and China on 7 April.

The Caribbean Twist on a Victorian ClassicNicholai La Barrie’s production at the Lyric Hammersmith delivers a distinct, gleefully camp reinterpretation of Oscar Wilde’s 1895 masterpiece. By utilizing an all-Black cast, the play moves beyond simple color-blind casting to infuse the text with a vibrant Caribbean identity. The production draws clear inspiration from the National Theatre’s recent campy interpretations, elevating the aesthetic with West Indian inflected accents, colorful headscarves, and flamboyant costumes designed by Rajha Shakiry.Key Cast Performances: Jamael Westman is cast as the louche Viscount Arthur Goring, while Chiké Okonkwo plays the upright Sir Robert Chiltern. Emmanuel Akwafo delivers a standout performance by doubling as the Chilterns' disapproving butler and Goring's servant.Aesthetic Elements: The set design and costumes waver between period and modern, creating an outrageous yet elegant atmosphere. The visual style is further enhanced by 'Pirates of the Caribbean' eyeliner and a soundtrack featuring tracks by DJ Luck & MC Neat, Ms Dynamite, and Ezra Collective.Modernizing Political CorruptionWhile the play is set in the drawing rooms of the aristocracy, its core theme of clandestine corruption remains strikingly relevant. The production draws parallels to modern political scandals, such as 'cash for questions,' though it tempers the sting by framing the protagonist's crime as a 'sin of one's youth.' This approach allows the audience to focus on the farcical nature of the aristocratic mores rather than a heavy-handed political critique.A Flamboyant Tribute to Queer HistoryThe camped-up nature of the production takes on added significance when viewed through the lens of Wilde’s tragic history. The play originally transferred to the Criterion theatre without Wilde’s name due to his prosecution for gross indecency. This current revival serves as a flamboyant celebration of queerness and a form of artistic payback, honoring the playwright’s legacy while reasserting his presence in the narrative.The Future of Classic RevivalsThe success of this production signals a growing trend in the theatre industry towards 'global majority' casting and the recontextualization of classic texts. With the show set to transfer to the Bristol Old Vic from 10-20 June, it demonstrates that traditional plays can be successfully modernized to resonate with contemporary audiences while maintaining their original wit and charm.