Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

Costa Rica has announced that it will accept 25 migrants deported from the United States per week as part of an agreement to assist with President Donald Trump's policy of deporting immigrants to 'third countries'.The Central American nation joins a growing number of countries across Africa and the Americas that have signed contentious, often secretive agreements with the US to accept deportees from other countries.In many cases, critics say migrants who previously hoped to seek asylum in the US are left in a legal 'black hole' in foreign countries where they don't speak the language.Countries that have agreed to receive third-party migrants include South Sudan, Honduras, Rwanda, Guyana and several Caribbean islands like Dominica and St Kitts and Nevis.'Costa Rica is prepared to see this flow of people,' said Costa Rican Public Security Minister Mario Zamora Cordero in a video statement on Thursday.Costa Rica's government signed the pact on Monday during a visit from US special envoy Kristi Noem, who was recently named to oversee the so-called 'Shield of the Americas'.Noem, who was fired earlier this month from her role as secretary of Homeland Security, has been travelling through Latin America, with recent stops in Guyana and Ecuador.The Trump administration has spent at least $40m to deport about 300 migrants to countries other than their own, according to a February report by the Democratic staff of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

A United States judge has ruled that he will not dismiss the drug-trafficking and weapons possession charges brought against former Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores.In a Thursday court hearing, Judge Alvin Hellerstein questioned whether the US government has the right to bar Venezuela from funding Maduro's legal expenses. The hearing was the first for Maduro and his wife since a brief January arraignment, where they pleaded not guilty.Maduro and Flores have sought to have the charges against them thrown out. Hellerstein declined to do so, but he pressed the prosecution on some of the issues Maduro's legal team raised in its petition to dismiss the case. Among them was a decision by the administration of US President Donald Trump to prevent the Venezuelan government from financing Maduro's defence.Federal prosecutors argued that national security reasons prevented the US from allowing such payments. They also pointed to ongoing sanctions against the Venezuelan government. But Hellerstein pushed back against that argument, noting that Trump had eased sanctions against Venezuela since Maduro's abduction on January 3. He also questioned how Maduro might pose a security threat while imprisoned in New York.“The defendant is here. Flores is here. They present no further national security threat,” said Hellerstein. “I see no abiding interest of national security on the right to defend themselves.”Hellerstein emphasised that, in the US, all criminal defendants have the right to a vigorous defence, as part of the US Constitution's Sixth Amendment. Maduro, who led Venezuela from 2013 to 2026, has been charged with four criminal counts, including “narco-terrorism” conspiracy, conspiracy to import cocaine, the possession of machine guns and the conspiracy to possess machine guns and other destructive devices.He and his wife were taken into US custody on January 3, after Trump launched an attack on Venezuela. The Trump administration has framed the military operation as a “law enforcement function”, but experts say it was widely considered illegal under international law, which protects local sovereignty.Trump himself weighed in on the proceedings during a Thursday US Cabinet meeting, hinting that further charges could be brought against Maduro. “He emptied his prisons in Venezuela, emptied his prisons into our country,” Trump said of Maduro, reiterating an unsubstantiated claim. “And I hope that charge will be brought at some point. Because that was a big charge that hasn’t been brought yet. It should be brought.”

Iran has formally responded to the US's proposal to end the nearly month-long war, asserting its 'natural and legal right' over the Strait of Hormuz. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-affiliated Tasnim news agency reported that Iran had sent its official response on Wednesday night and was awaiting a response.The Iranian response appears to contradict US President Donald Trump's claim that Tehran was 'begging to make a deal'. Instead, Iran has laid out conditions that signal a continued hardening of its position, including an end to 'aggressive acts of assassination', compensation and war reparations, measures to ensure 'war does not recur', and an end to hostilities from 'all resistance groups that took part in this battle throughout the region'.US special envoy Steve Witkoff claimed on Thursday that Tehran was seeking an 'off-ramp', with signs that Iran had realised there was no alternative to negotiation. However, the source cited in Tasnim's report slammed the US proposal, claiming that Washington sought to 'deceive the world' by presenting a peaceful image while preparing for 'ground invasion'.Trump posted on Truth Social that he would pause attacks on Iran's energy infrastructure for 10 days until April 6, claiming Tehran requested the move amid 'ongoing' talks that were 'going very well'. He also claimed that Iran was 'begging to make a deal', saying 'We are absolutely obliterating Iran' and that Iranians were 'lousy fighters, but great negotiators'. The economic and humanitarian toll of the conflict continues to mount, with Iran effectively blocking the Strait of Hormuz, leading to fuel shortages worldwide.

Ryan Murphy's drama series 'Love Story' has become Disney+'s most-streamed drama ever, captivating audiences worldwide with its schlocky, glossy portrayal of the doomed marriage between John F Kennedy Jr and Carolyn Bessette. The series, which consists of nine episodes, tells the story of the couple's whirlwind romance and tragic fate.The show's success can be attributed to its unique blend of camp nostalgia, paparazzi exposure, and cultural symbolism. According to TV critic Scott Bryan, Murphy's formula for success involves targeting subjects with tragic backstories and workable legal margins, which in practice means the longer they have been dead, the smoother the adaptation.The series begins as a Cinderella romance between a Kennedy scion and a Calvin Klein publicist who became the most famous and scrutinised couple in the US – and evolves into a lesson in what happens when marriage becomes a form of branding. The show's relatability factor also lies in its portrayal of universal dating themes, great hair, and a wardrobe full of Prada and Kangol caps worn backwards.Social media searches for JFK Jr and Bessette grew by more than 9,100% in the past month, according to FX, which created the show. The show's success has also sparked speculation about Murphy's next subject, with names like Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston, John Lennon and Yoko Ono, and Liz Taylor and Richard Burton being floated on social media.The show's impact can be seen in its ability to resonate with audiences, particularly Gen Z women, who have connected with the show's themes of relationships, style, and tragedy. As Bryan noted, 'Love Story' is 'unapologetically schmaltzy' and doesn't try to be anything more than a show that looks the part, making it a refreshing change from the usual prestige television dramas.

Lloyds Banking Group is embroiled in a significant court battle with approximately 30,000 car loan customers who are seeking £66m in compensation. The claims, being handled by the law firm Courmacs Legal, stem from allegations that Lloyds' motor finance arm, Black Horse, engaged in unfair commission arrangements with car dealers, leading to customers being overcharged for their loans. This case is part of a broader car loans commission scandal that has affected numerous consumers. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) had proposed a redress scheme worth an estimated £11bn to compensate affected customers. However, the claimants have opted to pursue a court case instead, citing concerns that the FCA's scheme may not provide adequate compensation. Under the FCA's proposed scheme, consumers were expected to receive an average payout of £700 per claim, which is less than half of the £1,500 average payout recommended by some consumer groups. This discrepancy has led claims law firms to argue that the scheme favors lenders over consumers. The court case, expected to be filed in the coming weeks, marks a significant development in the ongoing car finance mis-selling scandal. Courmacs Legal will represent the 30,000 claimants, taking a 28% cut of any successful payout. The firm believes that pursuing a court case is necessary to ensure that their clients receive fair compensation. A spokesperson for the FCA emphasized that their redress scheme is designed to provide consumers with fair compensation quickly and without incurring high fees. Meanwhile, Lloyds Bank has declined to comment on the matter. This case is likely to be the first in a series of omnibus suits against other lenders involved in the motor finance mis-selling scandal. A court of appeal case brought by Lloyds and other banks is currently pending, which could potentially impact the progression of Courmacs's omnibus claims.

The UK government is facing mounting pressure to appoint a Conservative former cabinet minister as the next chair of Ofcom, the media regulator. Jeremy Wright, a former culture secretary and sitting Conservative MP, is competing against Margaret Hodge, a Labour peer and former MP, for the role.The appointment has become crucial amid concerns over the rapid growth of online content and the rise of politically partisan broadcasting. The Online Safety Act, which aims to tackle harmful online content, has created legal pitfalls for Ofcom, leading to claims of paralysis at the regulator.Wright, who was involved in drafting laws to tackle harmful online content, is seen as a strong candidate due to his legal background as a king's counsel and his knowledge of the Online Safety Act. He is believed to be willing to take risks in confronting big digital platforms.On the other hand, Hodge has been seen as the favourite to be appointed by the Labour administration. As chair of the public accounts committee, she built a reputation for attacking big tech over its tax bill and has previously suggested banning online anonymity and making social media directors personally liable for defamatory posts.The delay in appointing a new chair is causing concern, with some warning that it could leave Britain at risk. The new chair must address fundamental flaws in Ofcom's implementation of the Online Safety Act and restore the frayed support and confidence of civil society.A government source said a decision would be made very soon. An Ofcom spokesperson said the regulator looks forward to working with whoever the government appoints as its next chair to make life safer online.

Senegal's football governing body has vowed to mount a crusade against the Confederation of African Football's (CAF) decision to strip the country of its African Cup of Nations (AFCON) title. The CAF's ruling was made after Senegal walked off the pitch in protest at a potentially decisive penalty awarded to Morocco in the final.The Senegalese Football Federation (FSF) has lodged an appeal at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) against the decision, with its legal team warning that the case could reshape the world of football and undermine the principle that refereeing decisions are final."This decision cannot even be considered a true sporting justice ruling – it is so crude, so absurd, so irrational," lawyer Juan de Dios Crespo Perez, representing Senegal's ruling body, told a news conference on Thursday.The FSF president, Abdoulaye Fall, said: "In the face of this administrative robbery, the FSF refuses fatality. We will fight a moral and legal crusade."Senegal's legal team has gathered international lawyers from Switzerland, Spain, France, and Senegal to plead the case, with lawyer Seydou Diagne saying the country suffered a "betrayal" and that they are asking CAS to speed up the process.

The United Nations has taken a significant step towards acknowledging the atrocities of transatlantic slavery, adopting a resolution that labels it as the 'gravest crime against humanity'. The resolution, proposed by Ghana, was passed with 123 countries in favor, 3 opposed, and 52 abstaining.The resolution is not legally binding but carries substantial political weight. It calls for reparations and urges member states to engage in dialogue on the issue, including issuing formal apologies, returning stolen artifacts, providing financial compensation, and ensuring guarantees of non-repetition.Ghana's President John Dramani Mahama, a key architect of the resolution, hailed its adoption as 'a route to healing and reparative justice'. The resolution's passage is seen as a crucial step towards addressing the ongoing impacts of slavery, which saw at least 12.5 million Africans abducted and sold between the 15th and 19th centuries.Despite the progress, there is growing backlash from Western leaders who oppose discussing reparations, arguing that today's states and institutions should not be held responsible for historical wrongs. The EU and the US expressed concerns that the resolution could imply a hierarchy among crimes against humanity.The Netherlands remains the only European country to have issued a formal apology for its role in slavery. The resolution comes after the African Union set out to create a 'unified vision' among its 55 member states about what reparations for slavery may look like.

A California jury has ruled that Meta and Google are liable for $3m in damages in a landmark social media addiction lawsuit. The case, which began over a month ago, accused the companies of designing features intended to hook young users, including notifications and autoplay features.The plaintiff, a 20-year-old woman referred to as KGM or Kaley, claimed that she became addicted to social media at a young age, which exacerbated her mental health issues. She began using YouTube at age six and Meta-owned Instagram at age nine.The jury deliberated for over 40 hours across nine days before reaching a verdict. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Instagram head Adam Mosseri testified in the case, although YouTube chief executive Neal Mohan was not called to testify.The verdict is the latest in a wave of lawsuits targeting social media companies. There is a looming federal social media addiction case slated to begin in June in Oakland, California. On Tuesday in New Mexico, a jury found that Meta violated state law by misleading users about the safety of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, and by enabling child sexual exploitation on those platforms.Legal experts say the verdict will shape future litigation. 'The fact the jury found Meta and Google liable represents that these cases have real exposure to the social media giants, and are going to frame how future litigation will proceed,' entertainment lawyer Tre Lovell told Al Jazeera.